Vygotskij's essay K voprosu o psichologii tvorčestva aktëra, originally published in 1936, is here translated for the first time into Italian by Massimo Lenzi. The Soviet psychologist's approach to the actor's creative work is founded upon the recognition that both theatrical and general psychology fall short to account for the complexity of the player's experience on the stage, unless the problem is considered in its historical and social dimension. Diderot's Paradoxe, according to Vygotskij, is founded on facts and there lies its merit and deep insight into the actor's work; nonetheless, equally apparent facts seem to suggest the possibility of different explanations, as for example those concerning Stanislavskij's pedagogical practice. Then again, Vachtangov's successful use of Stanislavskijan techniques in his own non-realistic stagings calls attention to the continuous shifting of the problem itself. So, the actor's paradox has not an unique solution, but every theatrical age and/or style implies its own paradox, exactly as the expression of human mental life through emotion and feelings changes with epochs and social structures. The essay is preceded by a translator's note dealing with the Italian rendering of certain concepts, whose use is peculiar to Russian theatrical culture.

Lev Semënovič Vygotskij. Sulla questione della psicologia della creazione artistica dell’attore

LENZI, Massimo
2015-01-01

Abstract

Vygotskij's essay K voprosu o psichologii tvorčestva aktëra, originally published in 1936, is here translated for the first time into Italian by Massimo Lenzi. The Soviet psychologist's approach to the actor's creative work is founded upon the recognition that both theatrical and general psychology fall short to account for the complexity of the player's experience on the stage, unless the problem is considered in its historical and social dimension. Diderot's Paradoxe, according to Vygotskij, is founded on facts and there lies its merit and deep insight into the actor's work; nonetheless, equally apparent facts seem to suggest the possibility of different explanations, as for example those concerning Stanislavskij's pedagogical practice. Then again, Vachtangov's successful use of Stanislavskijan techniques in his own non-realistic stagings calls attention to the continuous shifting of the problem itself. So, the actor's paradox has not an unique solution, but every theatrical age and/or style implies its own paradox, exactly as the expression of human mental life through emotion and feelings changes with epochs and social structures. The essay is preceded by a translator's note dealing with the Italian rendering of certain concepts, whose use is peculiar to Russian theatrical culture.
2015
K voprosu o psichologii tvorčestva aktëra
4
1
67
78
Teoria dell'attore, Psicologia dell'arte
Lenzi, Massimo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vygotskij_mj4.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 156.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
156.43 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1546118
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact