PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of major urological complications after kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 1,146 kidney transplants were performed at our institution. A total of 146 major complications occurred, including 77 obstructions, 36 leaks and 33 associated perigraft fluid collections. Percutaneous treatment was carried out in 118/146 complications in 91 patients. In the case of stenosis-obstruction and fistulas (104 complications), the first therapeutic step was placement of a nephrostomy catheter, followed by balloon ureteroplasty, placement of external-internal catheters and double-J stents; 14/33 collections were drained under ultrasound guidance. RESULTS: In all 118 percutaneous interventions, we were able to place a nephrostomy or drainage catheter, with a technical success rate of 100 %. The long-term success rate was 49.6 %: in 57/115 (three patients were lost to follow-up) we obtained the complete resolution of the complication. The procedure-related mortality rate was 0 %. There was only one major complication and the rate of minor complications was 14.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiology is the first choice option in the treatment of urological complications after kidney transplantation.

Treatment of urological complications in more than 1,000 kidney transplantations: the role of interventional radiology

FONIO, Paolo
First
;
Calandri M;FALETTI, Riccardo;GANDINI, Giovanni
2015-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of major urological complications after kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 1,146 kidney transplants were performed at our institution. A total of 146 major complications occurred, including 77 obstructions, 36 leaks and 33 associated perigraft fluid collections. Percutaneous treatment was carried out in 118/146 complications in 91 patients. In the case of stenosis-obstruction and fistulas (104 complications), the first therapeutic step was placement of a nephrostomy catheter, followed by balloon ureteroplasty, placement of external-internal catheters and double-J stents; 14/33 collections were drained under ultrasound guidance. RESULTS: In all 118 percutaneous interventions, we were able to place a nephrostomy or drainage catheter, with a technical success rate of 100 %. The long-term success rate was 49.6 %: in 57/115 (three patients were lost to follow-up) we obtained the complete resolution of the complication. The procedure-related mortality rate was 0 %. There was only one major complication and the rate of minor complications was 14.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiology is the first choice option in the treatment of urological complications after kidney transplantation.
2015
120
2
206
212
http://link.springer.com/journal/11547
Interventional radiology; Renal transplantation; Urological complications; Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Urologic Diseases; Radiology, Interventional; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging; Medicine (all)
Fonio P;Appendino E;Calandri M;Faletti R;Righi D;Gandini G
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
art Treatment of urological Radiol Med 2014.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 546.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
546.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/154818
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact