Lenalidomide-dexamethasone improved outcome in newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We randomized 662 patients ≥65 years or transplant-ineligible to receive induction with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) or cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide (CPR) or lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in triplet (MPR+CPR) vs doublet (Rd) lenalidomide-containing regimens. After a median follow-up of 39 months, the median PFS was 22 months for the triplet combinations and 21 months for the doublet (p=0.284). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in both groups, and the 4-year OS was 67% for the triplet and 58% for the doublet (p=0.709). By considering the three treatment arms separately, no difference in outcome was detected between MPR, CPR and Rd. The most common grade ≥3 toxicity was neutropenia: 64% in MPR, 29% in CPR and 25% in Rd patients (p<0.0001). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicities were similar among groups and were mainly infections (6.5-11%), constitutional (3.5-9.5%) and cardiac (4.5-6%), with no difference between the arms. In conclusion, in the overall population, the alkylator-containing triplets MPR and CPR were not superior to the alkylator-free doublet Rd, which was associated with lower toxicity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01093196.

Triplet vs doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

MAGAROTTO, VALERIA
First
;
BRINGHEN, Sara;MINA, Roberto;CICCONE, GIOVANNINO;RUGGERI, Marina;BOCCADORO, Mario;PALUMBO, Antonio
Last
2016-01-01

Abstract

Lenalidomide-dexamethasone improved outcome in newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We randomized 662 patients ≥65 years or transplant-ineligible to receive induction with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) or cyclophosphamide-prednisone-lenalidomide (CPR) or lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in triplet (MPR+CPR) vs doublet (Rd) lenalidomide-containing regimens. After a median follow-up of 39 months, the median PFS was 22 months for the triplet combinations and 21 months for the doublet (p=0.284). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in both groups, and the 4-year OS was 67% for the triplet and 58% for the doublet (p=0.709). By considering the three treatment arms separately, no difference in outcome was detected between MPR, CPR and Rd. The most common grade ≥3 toxicity was neutropenia: 64% in MPR, 29% in CPR and 25% in Rd patients (p<0.0001). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicities were similar among groups and were mainly infections (6.5-11%), constitutional (3.5-9.5%) and cardiac (4.5-6%), with no difference between the arms. In conclusion, in the overall population, the alkylator-containing triplets MPR and CPR were not superior to the alkylator-free doublet Rd, which was associated with lower toxicity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01093196.
2016
127
9
1102
1108
https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/127/9/1102/126446/Triplet-vs-doublet-lenalidomide-containing
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-08-662627
Magarotto, Valeria; Bringhen, Sara; Offidani, Massimo; Benevolo, Giulia; Patriarca, Francesca; Mina, Roberto; Falcone, Antonietta Pia; De Paoli, Loren...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EMN01 Blood 2016.pdf

Open Access dal 02/04/2017

Descrizione: Author's version. Magarotto V, Bringhen S, Offidani M, Benevolo G, Patriarca F, Mina R, Falcone AP, De Paoli L, Pietrantuono G, Gentili S, Musolino C, Giuliani N, Bernardini A, Conticello C, Pulini S, Ciccone G, Maisnar V, Ruggeri M, Zambello R, Guglielmelli T, Ledda A, Liberati AM, Montefusco V, Hajek R, Boccadoro M, Palumbo A. Triplet vs doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016 Mar 3;127(9):1102-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-662627. Epub 2016 Jan 4. Erratum in: Blood. 2018 Mar 29;131(13):1495. PMID: 26729895. © 2016 by The American Society of Hematology. The published version is available at: https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/127/9/1102/126446/Triplet-vs-doublet-lenalidomide-containing | https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-08-662627 . When citing, please refer to the published version.
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 681.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
681.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
[PUBLISHED Version] Magarotto et al - Blood 2016 - Triplet vs Doublet.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Restricted Access - Published version. Magarotto V, Bringhen S, Offidani M, Benevolo G, Patriarca F, Mina R, Falcone AP, De Paoli L, Pietrantuono G, Gentili S, Musolino C, Giuliani N, Bernardini A, Conticello C, Pulini S, Ciccone G, Maisnar V, Ruggeri M, Zambello R, Guglielmelli T, Ledda A, Liberati AM, Montefusco V, Hajek R, Boccadoro M, Palumbo A. Triplet vs doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016 Mar 3;127(9):1102-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-662627. Epub 2016 Jan 4. Erratum in: Blood. 2018 Mar 29;131(13):1495. PMID: 26729895. © 2016 by The American Society of Hematology. The published version is available at: https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/127/9/1102/126446/Triplet-vs-doublet-lenalidomide-containing | https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-08-662627
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1557489
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 32
  • Scopus 79
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 76
social impact