We study the institutional solutions needed in a decentralized framework to cope with the potential adverse welfare effects caused by localized negative shocks, that impact on the provision of public services and that can be limited by precautionary investments. We consider first a public relief fund to cover these ‘collective risks’. We analyse the underinvestment problem stemming from the moral hazard of Local administrations, when investments are defined at the local level and are not observable by the Central government that manages the relief fund. We then examine the potential role of private insurers in solving the underinvestment problem. Our analysis shows that the public fund is almost always a better institutional arrangement with respect to the private insurance solution, but competitive private insurers can improve social welfare in the presence of Central government’s soft budget constraints problems, especially when the number of Local administrations is large.

Optimal Risk Allocation in the Provision of Local Public Services: Can a Private Insurer be Better Than a Federal Relief Fund?

TURATI, Gilberto
2014-01-01

Abstract

We study the institutional solutions needed in a decentralized framework to cope with the potential adverse welfare effects caused by localized negative shocks, that impact on the provision of public services and that can be limited by precautionary investments. We consider first a public relief fund to cover these ‘collective risks’. We analyse the underinvestment problem stemming from the moral hazard of Local administrations, when investments are defined at the local level and are not observable by the Central government that manages the relief fund. We then examine the potential role of private insurers in solving the underinvestment problem. Our analysis shows that the public fund is almost always a better institutional arrangement with respect to the private insurance solution, but competitive private insurers can improve social welfare in the presence of Central government’s soft budget constraints problems, especially when the number of Local administrations is large.
2014
60
747
779
collective risks; precautionary investments; Federal Relief Fund; private insurers; disaster management
L. Buzzacchi;G. Turati
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CESifo Buzzacchi Turati early view.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 222.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
222.16 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Open Access_BuzzacchiTurati_CESifoES_2014.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 280.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
280.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/155751
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact