The aim of the study is to evaluate gender-related socio-demographic and clinical differences in a large sample of inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. A sample of 353 acute patients, consecutively hospitalized between January 2007 and December 2008 in the Psychiatric Emergency Service of the San Giovanni Battista Hospital, was recruited. Psychiatric assessment included the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Differences between the groups were tested using chi-square test and ANOVA. Data were analyzed using a three-way MANOVA with the six BPRS scales with repeated measures for admission/discharge and BPRS total score baseline and independent groups for men and women. A two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was performed for CGI-S and GAF. Men were younger, more likely to be never married, more often substance abusers. Male patients showed both lower anxious-depressive and anergia symptom scores and higher activation symptom scores than female patients. Brief hospitalization was shown to be highly effective in both groups. Females showed a significantly better improvement in anergia and activation than males. The present evidence suggests that management of acute psychosis should target specific gender differences which should influence therapeutic approach in all its modalities.

Gender differences in 353 inpatients with acute psychosis: The experience of one Psychiatric Emergency Service of Turin

MONTEMAGNI, Cristiana;FRIERI, TIZIANA;BLANDAMURA, Arianna;ROCCA, Paola
Last
2015-01-01

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate gender-related socio-demographic and clinical differences in a large sample of inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. A sample of 353 acute patients, consecutively hospitalized between January 2007 and December 2008 in the Psychiatric Emergency Service of the San Giovanni Battista Hospital, was recruited. Psychiatric assessment included the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Differences between the groups were tested using chi-square test and ANOVA. Data were analyzed using a three-way MANOVA with the six BPRS scales with repeated measures for admission/discharge and BPRS total score baseline and independent groups for men and women. A two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was performed for CGI-S and GAF. Men were younger, more likely to be never married, more often substance abusers. Male patients showed both lower anxious-depressive and anergia symptom scores and higher activation symptom scores than female patients. Brief hospitalization was shown to be highly effective in both groups. Females showed a significantly better improvement in anergia and activation than males. The present evidence suggests that management of acute psychosis should target specific gender differences which should influence therapeutic approach in all its modalities.
2015
227
2-3
192
197
www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres
Acute psychosis; Gender differences; Hospitalization; Psychiatric emergency service; Schizophrenia spectrum disorder; Adult; Anxiety; Depression; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Sex Factors; Psychiatry and Mental Health; Biological Psychiatry; Medicine (all)
Montemagni, Cristiana; Frieri, Tiziana; Blandamura, Arianna; Villari, Vincenzo; Rocca, Paola
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Montemagni 2015 - Gender differences.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 277.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
277.85 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1558777
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact