In many urban and natural areas, the presence of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) requires a geological risk evaluation to enforce safety and exposure monitoring during the achievement of surface and subsurface infrastructures. A set up of proper procedures must provide: (i) a detailed geological model of the possible presence of the asbestos, (ii) a representative sampling, (iii) a correct analytical approach, and (iv) a working procedure that can be efficiently applied during excavation activities. At present, the EU regulations for a safety work in asbestos-bearing materials are still not exhaustive because of the great complexity of the matter and uncertainties in geological risk definition. This paper presents two case studies where the different involved parties (scientific community, environmental agencies, and private companies) jointly contributed to find technical solutions for a correct risk management of excavations in asbestos-bearing rocks as well as reliable analytical procedures for quantitative determination of the fibre content.

Geological and analytical procedures for the evaluation of asbestos-related risk in underground and surface rock excavation

TURCI, Francesco;COMPAGNONI, Roberto;TOMATIS, Maura;FUBINI, Bice;
2015-01-01

Abstract

In many urban and natural areas, the presence of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) requires a geological risk evaluation to enforce safety and exposure monitoring during the achievement of surface and subsurface infrastructures. A set up of proper procedures must provide: (i) a detailed geological model of the possible presence of the asbestos, (ii) a representative sampling, (iii) a correct analytical approach, and (iv) a working procedure that can be efficiently applied during excavation activities. At present, the EU regulations for a safety work in asbestos-bearing materials are still not exhaustive because of the great complexity of the matter and uncertainties in geological risk definition. This paper presents two case studies where the different involved parties (scientific community, environmental agencies, and private companies) jointly contributed to find technical solutions for a correct risk management of excavations in asbestos-bearing rocks as well as reliable analytical procedures for quantitative determination of the fibre content.
2015
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 5
Springer International Publishing
5
619
622
978-331909048-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09048-1
Asbestos Confinement; Best Practices; Excavation In Ultramafic Rocks; Naturally Occurring Asbestos; Risk Analysis; Earth and Planetary Sciences (all); Social Sciences (all)
Turci, F.; Compagnoni, R.; Tomatis, M.; Fubini, B.; Piana, F.; Delle Piane, L.; Tallone, S.; Fuoco, S.; Bergamini, M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Turci et al, 2015 - IAEG Conf Paper.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Capitolo libro
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 250.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
250.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1560701
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact