Abstract Background The last 30 years have witnessed a significant increase in the diagnosis of early-stage rectal cancer and the development of new strategies to reduce the treatment-related morbidity. Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of early rectal cancer (ERC), and the best management of ERC has not been yet defined. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery in collaboration with the European Society of Coloproctology developed this consensus conference to provide recommendations on ERC diagnosis, staging and treatment based on the available evidence. Methods A multidisciplinary group of experts selected on their clinical and scientific expertise was invited to critically review the literature and to formulate evidence-based recommendations by the Delphi method. Recommendations were discussed at the plenary session of the 14th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Paris, 26 June 2014, and then posted on the EAES website for open discussion. Results Tumour biopsy has a low accuracy. Digital rectal examination plays a key role in the pre-operative work-up. Magnification chromoendoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are complementary staging modalities. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery are the two established approaches for local excision (LE) of selected ERC. The role of all organ-sparing approaches including neoadjuvant therapies followed by LE should be formally assessed by randomized controlled trials. Rectal resection and total mesorectal excision is indicated in the presence of unfavourable features at the pathological evaluation of the LE specimen. The laparoscopic approach has better short-term outcomes and similar oncologic results when compared with open surgery. Conclusions The management of ERC should always be based on a multidisciplinary approach, aiming to increase the rate of organ-preserving procedures without jeopardizing survival.

Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference.

MORINO, Mario
First
;
ALLAIX, Marco Ettore
Last
2015-01-01

Abstract

Abstract Background The last 30 years have witnessed a significant increase in the diagnosis of early-stage rectal cancer and the development of new strategies to reduce the treatment-related morbidity. Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of early rectal cancer (ERC), and the best management of ERC has not been yet defined. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery in collaboration with the European Society of Coloproctology developed this consensus conference to provide recommendations on ERC diagnosis, staging and treatment based on the available evidence. Methods A multidisciplinary group of experts selected on their clinical and scientific expertise was invited to critically review the literature and to formulate evidence-based recommendations by the Delphi method. Recommendations were discussed at the plenary session of the 14th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Paris, 26 June 2014, and then posted on the EAES website for open discussion. Results Tumour biopsy has a low accuracy. Digital rectal examination plays a key role in the pre-operative work-up. Magnification chromoendoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are complementary staging modalities. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery are the two established approaches for local excision (LE) of selected ERC. The role of all organ-sparing approaches including neoadjuvant therapies followed by LE should be formally assessed by randomized controlled trials. Rectal resection and total mesorectal excision is indicated in the presence of unfavourable features at the pathological evaluation of the LE specimen. The laparoscopic approach has better short-term outcomes and similar oncologic results when compared with open surgery. Conclusions The management of ERC should always be based on a multidisciplinary approach, aiming to increase the rate of organ-preserving procedures without jeopardizing survival.
2015
29
4
755
773
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-015-4067-3
Early rectal cancer Local excision Neoadjuvant chemoradiation Laparoscopy Total mesorectal excision
Morino M; Risio M; Bach S; Beets-Tan R; Bujko K; Panis Y; Quirke P; Rembacken B; Rullier E; Saito Y; Young-Fadok T; Allaix ME
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
consensus art%3A10.1007%2Fs00464-015-4067-3(1).pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 381.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
381.68 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Consensus Statement_4aperto.pdf

Open Access dal 01/06/2016

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 248.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
248.93 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/156085
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 26
  • Scopus 110
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 97
social impact