OBJECTIVE:: To establish a structured international expert consensus on a detailed technical description of the laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). BACKGROUND:: Laparoscopic TME is a common surgical approach for the treatment of rectal cancer, but there is little agreement on technical details and standards. METHODS:: Sixty leading surgical experts from 5 different world regions with a median overall experience of 250 laparoscopic TME participated in this study. Four stages of mixed quantitative and qualitative consensus-finding methods were applied. (1) Semistructured expert interviews were independently analyzed by 2 assessors. (2) Consensus on the interview data was reached using reiterating questionnaires (Delphi method). (3) This was further refined in an interactive workshop. (4) Based on this meeting, a comprehensive text was drafted and final approval was sought by all experts. FINDINGS:: Three theme categories were identified in 9 detailed interviews (anatomical landmarks, description of tissue retraction, and operating strategies). Following 2 rounds of a 54-item questionnaire, 29 items achieved very high agreement (A* ≥90%), 14 with good agreement (≥80%), 13 with moderate agreement (≥50%), and 18 with little or no agreement (<50%). In the workshop, areas of agreement were consolidated and conclusions were sought for those with less agreement. The final document was approved after 2 further rounds of surveys by all respondents. CONCLUSIONS:: This detailed and agreed technical description of laparoscopic TME may have implications on training, assessment, quality control, and future research.

Standardization of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

MORINO, Mario;
2015-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: To establish a structured international expert consensus on a detailed technical description of the laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). BACKGROUND:: Laparoscopic TME is a common surgical approach for the treatment of rectal cancer, but there is little agreement on technical details and standards. METHODS:: Sixty leading surgical experts from 5 different world regions with a median overall experience of 250 laparoscopic TME participated in this study. Four stages of mixed quantitative and qualitative consensus-finding methods were applied. (1) Semistructured expert interviews were independently analyzed by 2 assessors. (2) Consensus on the interview data was reached using reiterating questionnaires (Delphi method). (3) This was further refined in an interactive workshop. (4) Based on this meeting, a comprehensive text was drafted and final approval was sought by all experts. FINDINGS:: Three theme categories were identified in 9 detailed interviews (anatomical landmarks, description of tissue retraction, and operating strategies). Following 2 rounds of a 54-item questionnaire, 29 items achieved very high agreement (A* ≥90%), 14 with good agreement (≥80%), 13 with moderate agreement (≥50%), and 18 with little or no agreement (<50%). In the workshop, areas of agreement were consolidated and conclusions were sought for those with less agreement. The final document was approved after 2 further rounds of surveys by all respondents. CONCLUSIONS:: This detailed and agreed technical description of laparoscopic TME may have implications on training, assessment, quality control, and future research.
2015
261
4
716
722
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=10.1097/SLA.0000000000000823
colorectal surgery; consensus; expert; laparoscopic; rectal cancer; total mesorectal excision
Miskovic D1; Foster J; Agha A; Delaney CP; Francis N; Hasegawa H; Karachun A; Kim SH; Law WL; Marks J; Morino M; Panis Y; Uriburu JC; Wexner SD; Parvaiz A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Standardization of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision …_4aperto.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 118.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
118.86 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
standardization00000658-201504000-00016(2).pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 149.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
149.84 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/156182
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 24
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact