Despite his negative review of Frederick Antal’s Florentine Painting and Its Social Background, Meiss was often equated with his sociological approach – especially by Italian critics. This misconception was fuelled by Antal himself – who in a later article saw in Meiss’ cultural history a reflection of his method – and was surely influenced by the wider acceptance of Antalian Marxism – at least within the Italian milieu. Finally, we shall discuss whether Kulturgeschichte is the appropriate definition for Meiss’ concern with socio-cultural context, which is common to a certain part of American criticism.
Storia sociale dell’arte o Kulturgeschichte? Millard Meiss e la recensione a Frederick Antal
COOKE, Jennifer
2011-01-01
Abstract
Despite his negative review of Frederick Antal’s Florentine Painting and Its Social Background, Meiss was often equated with his sociological approach – especially by Italian critics. This misconception was fuelled by Antal himself – who in a later article saw in Meiss’ cultural history a reflection of his method – and was surely influenced by the wider acceptance of Antalian Marxism – at least within the Italian milieu. Finally, we shall discuss whether Kulturgeschichte is the appropriate definition for Meiss’ concern with socio-cultural context, which is common to a certain part of American criticism.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



