INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may be performed using the transfemoral (TF) or transapical (TA) approach in most patients with aortic stenosis. The impact of access choice on peri-procedural and midterm results remains to be defined. METHODS: Medline and Cochrane Library were searched for articles describing differences in baseline, peri-procedural, and midterm outcomes among patients undergoing TF or TA TAVI. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality after at least 1-year follow-up, while secondary end-points were 30 days mortality and in-hospital complications (bleeding and cerebrovascular events). The independent impact of access choice was evaluated with pooled analysis using a random-effect model. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 10,468 patients were included. TF was the most exploited strategy (69.5% vs. 30.5%). After adjusting for confounding variables, 30-day and midterm follow-up mortality (median 365 days, range 222-400) were lower in TF patients with a pooled adjusted odds ratio of 0.81 (0.68-0.97 I(2) 99%) and 0.85 (0.80-0.90 I(2) 96%), respectively. Regarding periprocedural outcomes, TF reduced risk of bleedings and strokes (OR of 0.74 [0.66-0.82 I(2) 95%] and 0.91 [0.83-0.99] I(2) 86%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TF approach reduces mortality in TAVI patients, due to lower rates of periprocedural bleedings and strokes.

Impact of access on TAVI procedural and midterm follow-up: a meta-analysis of 13 studies and 10,468 patients.

D'ASCENZO, FABRIZIO;GIORDANA, Francesca;GAITA, Fiorenzo;
2014

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may be performed using the transfemoral (TF) or transapical (TA) approach in most patients with aortic stenosis. The impact of access choice on peri-procedural and midterm results remains to be defined. METHODS: Medline and Cochrane Library were searched for articles describing differences in baseline, peri-procedural, and midterm outcomes among patients undergoing TF or TA TAVI. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality after at least 1-year follow-up, while secondary end-points were 30 days mortality and in-hospital complications (bleeding and cerebrovascular events). The independent impact of access choice was evaluated with pooled analysis using a random-effect model. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 10,468 patients were included. TF was the most exploited strategy (69.5% vs. 30.5%). After adjusting for confounding variables, 30-day and midterm follow-up mortality (median 365 days, range 222-400) were lower in TF patients with a pooled adjusted odds ratio of 0.81 (0.68-0.97 I(2) 99%) and 0.85 (0.80-0.90 I(2) 96%), respectively. Regarding periprocedural outcomes, TF reduced risk of bleedings and strokes (OR of 0.74 [0.66-0.82 I(2) 95%] and 0.91 [0.83-0.99] I(2) 86%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TF approach reduces mortality in TAVI patients, due to lower rates of periprocedural bleedings and strokes.
27
5
500
508
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joic.12141/pdf
Conrotto F;D'Ascenzo F;Giordana F.;Colaci C;Sacciatella P;Biondi-Zoccai G;Moretti C;D'Amico M;Gaita F;Marra S
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/156261
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact