Since Italian liver allocation policy was last revised (in 2012), relevant critical issues and conceptual advances have emerged, calling for significant improvements. We report the results of a national consensus conference process, promoted by the Italian College of Liver Transplant Surgeons (for the Italian Society for Organ Transplantation) and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, to review the best indicators for orienting organ allocation policies based on principles of urgency, utility, and transplant benefit in the light of current scientific evidence. MELD exceptions and hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed to construct a transplantation priority algorithm, given the inequity of a purely MELD-based system for governing organ allocation. Working groups of transplant surgeons and hepatologists prepared a list of statements for each topic, scoring their quality of evidence and strength of recommendation using the Centers for Disease Control grading system. A jury of Italian transplant surgeons, hepatologists, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, epidemiologists, representatives of patients' associations and organ-sharing organizations, transplant coordinators, and ethicists voted on and validated the proposed statements. After carefully reviewing the statements, a critical proposal for revising Italy's current liver allocation policy was prepared jointly by transplant surgeons and hepatologists.

A Multistep, Consensus-Based Approach to Organ Allocation in Liver Transplantation: Toward a "Blended Principle Model"

ROMAGNOLI, Renato;AMOROSO, Antonio;
2015

Abstract

Since Italian liver allocation policy was last revised (in 2012), relevant critical issues and conceptual advances have emerged, calling for significant improvements. We report the results of a national consensus conference process, promoted by the Italian College of Liver Transplant Surgeons (for the Italian Society for Organ Transplantation) and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, to review the best indicators for orienting organ allocation policies based on principles of urgency, utility, and transplant benefit in the light of current scientific evidence. MELD exceptions and hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed to construct a transplantation priority algorithm, given the inequity of a purely MELD-based system for governing organ allocation. Working groups of transplant surgeons and hepatologists prepared a list of statements for each topic, scoring their quality of evidence and strength of recommendation using the Centers for Disease Control grading system. A jury of Italian transplant surgeons, hepatologists, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, epidemiologists, representatives of patients' associations and organ-sharing organizations, transplant coordinators, and ethicists voted on and validated the proposed statements. After carefully reviewing the statements, a critical proposal for revising Italy's current liver allocation policy was prepared jointly by transplant surgeons and hepatologists.
15
10
2552
2561
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajt.13408/abstract;jsessionid=EBD463537F3EDC99852767B312737FE2.f04t03
liver transplantation, organ allocation
Cillo, U; Burra, P; Mazzaferro, V; Belli, L; Pinna, Ad; Spada, M; Nanni Costa, A; Toniutto, P; Avolio, A; Cescon, M; Romagnoli, R; Santaniello, W; Rossi, M; Corno, V; Caraceni, P; Coco, B; Fraquelli, M; Rendina, M; Angelico, M; Fagiuoli, S; Bruno, R; Costa, An; Ridolfi, L; R, ; Pretagostini, R; Amoroso, A; Biancofiore, G; De Gasperi, A; Rocca, Gd; Feltracco, P; Colli, A; Sacchini, D; Pegoraro, R; Gardini, I; Pipit, P; Maffeo, C; Rossellini, Sr.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cillo_Am_J_Transpl_2015,15,2552-2561.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 319.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
319.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
PrePrint_Cillo_AJT2015.pdf

Accesso aperto con embargo fino al 31/10/2016

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1565693
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 48
  • Scopus 126
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 124
social impact