PURPOSE: To assess the time interval required to reach a new steady state of oxygenation-, ventilation-, respiratory mechanics- and hemodynamics-related variables after decreasing/increasing positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). METHODS: In 23 patients (group 1) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), PEEP was decreased from 10 to 5 cmH2O and, after 60', it was increased from 5 to 15 cmH2O. In 21 other ARDS patients (group 2), PEEP was increased from 10 to 15 cmH2O and, after 60', decreased from 15 to 5 cmH2O. Oxygenation, ventilation, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic variables were recorded at time 5', 15', 30' and 60' after each PEEP change. RESULTS: When PEEP was decreased, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, venous admixture and arterial oxygen saturation reached their equilibrium after 5'. In contrast, when PEEP was increased, the equilibrium was not reached even after 60'. The ventilation-related variables did not change significantly with PEEP. The respiratory system compliance, when PEEP was decreased, significantly worsened only after 60'. Hemodynamics did not change significantly with PEEP. In the individual patients the change of oxygenation-related variables and of respiratory system compliance observed after 5' could predict the changes recorded after 60'. This was not possible for PaCO2. CONCLUSIONS: We could not find a unique equilibration time for all the considered variables. However, in general, a decremental PEEP test requires far lower equilibrium time than an incremental PEEP test, suggesting a different time course for derecruitment and recruitment patterns.

Time to reach a new steady state after changes of positive end expiratory pressure.

BRAZZI, Luca;
2013-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the time interval required to reach a new steady state of oxygenation-, ventilation-, respiratory mechanics- and hemodynamics-related variables after decreasing/increasing positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). METHODS: In 23 patients (group 1) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), PEEP was decreased from 10 to 5 cmH2O and, after 60', it was increased from 5 to 15 cmH2O. In 21 other ARDS patients (group 2), PEEP was increased from 10 to 15 cmH2O and, after 60', decreased from 15 to 5 cmH2O. Oxygenation, ventilation, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic variables were recorded at time 5', 15', 30' and 60' after each PEEP change. RESULTS: When PEEP was decreased, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, venous admixture and arterial oxygen saturation reached their equilibrium after 5'. In contrast, when PEEP was increased, the equilibrium was not reached even after 60'. The ventilation-related variables did not change significantly with PEEP. The respiratory system compliance, when PEEP was decreased, significantly worsened only after 60'. Hemodynamics did not change significantly with PEEP. In the individual patients the change of oxygenation-related variables and of respiratory system compliance observed after 5' could predict the changes recorded after 60'. This was not possible for PaCO2. CONCLUSIONS: We could not find a unique equilibration time for all the considered variables. However, in general, a decremental PEEP test requires far lower equilibrium time than an incremental PEEP test, suggesting a different time course for derecruitment and recruitment patterns.
2013
39
8
1377
1385
Chiumello D; Coppola S; Froio S; Mietto C; Brazzi L; Carlesso E; Gattinoni L
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ICM 2013.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 413.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
413.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Time to reach a new steady_4aperto.pdf

Open Access dal 30/08/2014

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 186.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
186.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/156854
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact