BACKGROUND: There is no consensus with regard to which charts are most suitable for monitoring the postnatal growth of preterm infants. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the strategies used to develop existing postnatal growth charts for preterm infants and their methodologic quality. DESIGN: A systematic review of observational longitudinal studies, having as their primary objective the creation of postnatal growth charts for preterm infants, was conducted. Thirty-eight items distributed in 3 methodologic domains ("study design," "statistical methods," and "reporting methods") were assessed in each study. Each item was scored as a "low" or "high" risk of bias. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. A total quality score [(number of "low risk" of bias marks/total number of items assessed) × 100%] was calculated for each study. Median (range, IQR) quality scores for each methodologic domain and for all included studies were computed. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven (44.3%) of the 61 studies scored ≥50%, of which 10 scored >60% and only 1 scored >66%. The median (range, IQR) quality score for the 61 included studies was 47% (26-75%, 34-56%). The scores for the domains study design, statistical methods, and reporting methods were 44% (19-67%, 33-52%), 25% (0-88%, 13-38%), and 33% (0-100%, 0-33%), respectively. The most common shortcomings were observed in items related to anthropometric measures (the main variable of interest), gestational age estimation, follow-up duration, reporting of postnatal care and morbidities, assessment of outliers, covariates, and chart presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The overall methodologic quality of existing longitudinal studies was fair to low. To overcome these problems, the Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study, 1 of the 3 main components of The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Project, was designed to construct preterm postnatal growth standards from a prospective cohort of "healthy" pregnancies and preterm newborns without evidence of fetal growth restriction.

Monitoring postnatal growth of preterm infants: Present and future

GIULIANI, FRANCESCA;BERTINO, Enrico;ROVELLI, Ilaria;
2016-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus with regard to which charts are most suitable for monitoring the postnatal growth of preterm infants. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the strategies used to develop existing postnatal growth charts for preterm infants and their methodologic quality. DESIGN: A systematic review of observational longitudinal studies, having as their primary objective the creation of postnatal growth charts for preterm infants, was conducted. Thirty-eight items distributed in 3 methodologic domains ("study design," "statistical methods," and "reporting methods") were assessed in each study. Each item was scored as a "low" or "high" risk of bias. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. A total quality score [(number of "low risk" of bias marks/total number of items assessed) × 100%] was calculated for each study. Median (range, IQR) quality scores for each methodologic domain and for all included studies were computed. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven (44.3%) of the 61 studies scored ≥50%, of which 10 scored >60% and only 1 scored >66%. The median (range, IQR) quality score for the 61 included studies was 47% (26-75%, 34-56%). The scores for the domains study design, statistical methods, and reporting methods were 44% (19-67%, 33-52%), 25% (0-88%, 13-38%), and 33% (0-100%, 0-33%), respectively. The most common shortcomings were observed in items related to anthropometric measures (the main variable of interest), gestational age estimation, follow-up duration, reporting of postnatal care and morbidities, assessment of outliers, covariates, and chart presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The overall methodologic quality of existing longitudinal studies was fair to low. To overcome these problems, the Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study, 1 of the 3 main components of The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Project, was designed to construct preterm postnatal growth standards from a prospective cohort of "healthy" pregnancies and preterm newborns without evidence of fetal growth restriction.
2016
103
2
635
647
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/103/2/635S.full.pdf+html
Growth charts; Perinatal outcomes; Phenotypes; Postnatal growth; Preterm birth; Syndrome; Systematic review; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Growth Charts; Growth Disorders; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Male; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Child Development; Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Precision Medicine; Medicine (miscellaneous); Nutrition and Dietetics; Medicine (all)
Giuliani, Francesca; Ismail, Leila Cheikh; Bertino, Enrico; Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.; Ohuma, Eric O.; Rovelli, Ilaria; Conde-Agudelo, Agustin; Villar, José; Kennedy, Stephen H.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
monitoring present e future giuiani.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 915.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
915.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1569570
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact