AIM: To investigate the state of the art regarding Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) or Particulated Juvenile Allograft Cartilage (PJAC). METHODS: The authors searched the English literature regarding CAIS and PJAC. The search strategy was: (particulated cartilage) OR autologous cartilage fragments. All basic science articles were included. Clinical articles with less than 10 patients treated and less than 6 mo of follow-up were excluded. With these criteria, a total of 17 articles were available for the present review. RESULTS: PJAC and CAIS are relatively novel techniques for cartilage repair. Good basic science evidence was described to support the concept. Although the preliminary clinical reports show encouraging results, clinical data are still limited, especially for CAIS. The indications for both techniques need to be precisely defined (age of the patients, size of the lesion, and involvement of the subchondral bone), together with other debated issues. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the authors can state that encouraging preliminary results are available for both techniques. However, further studies are necessary to precisely determine the indications, surgical techniques, and long term outcomes for PJAC and CAIS.

Use of chondral fragments for one stage cartilage repair: A systematic review

BONASIA, Davide Edoardo;ROSSO, Federica;ROSSI, Roberto
Last
2015-01-01

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the state of the art regarding Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) or Particulated Juvenile Allograft Cartilage (PJAC). METHODS: The authors searched the English literature regarding CAIS and PJAC. The search strategy was: (particulated cartilage) OR autologous cartilage fragments. All basic science articles were included. Clinical articles with less than 10 patients treated and less than 6 mo of follow-up were excluded. With these criteria, a total of 17 articles were available for the present review. RESULTS: PJAC and CAIS are relatively novel techniques for cartilage repair. Good basic science evidence was described to support the concept. Although the preliminary clinical reports show encouraging results, clinical data are still limited, especially for CAIS. The indications for both techniques need to be precisely defined (age of the patients, size of the lesion, and involvement of the subchondral bone), together with other debated issues. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the authors can state that encouraging preliminary results are available for both techniques. However, further studies are necessary to precisely determine the indications, surgical techniques, and long term outcomes for PJAC and CAIS.
2015
6
11
1006
1011
http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/DownLoadFile.aspx?Type=Digital&SubType=1&DOI=10.5312%2fwjo.v6.i11.1006&FilePath=Pub%5c10.5312%5cv6%5ci11%5cWJO-6-1006.pdf
Adult; Cartilage; Chondral fragments; Juvenile; Particulated cartilage; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Bonasia, Davide Edoardo; Marmotti, Antongiulio; Rosso, Federica; Collo, Gianluca; Rossi, Roberto
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Use of chondral.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 898.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
898.89 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1576410
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact