This contribution describes and analyses how public prosecutors offices choose which crimes to pursue, even if the italian law provides for the mandatory prosecution. It explores how both the rise of a new managerial justice, the crisis of the paradigm of judicial ritual and the definition of new criteria of accountability of justice place prosecution at a key point between claim of justice, people fears and efficiency.
The Choices of the Court with respect to Which Crimes to Pursue: a Case Study
BLENGINO, Cecilia Piera;TORRENTE, GIOVANNI
2016-01-01
Abstract
This contribution describes and analyses how public prosecutors offices choose which crimes to pursue, even if the italian law provides for the mandatory prosecution. It explores how both the rise of a new managerial justice, the crisis of the paradigm of judicial ritual and the definition of new criteria of accountability of justice place prosecution at a key point between claim of justice, people fears and efficiency.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blengino_Choices_of_Courts_p139_148.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
2.19 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.19 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
