Abstract PURPOSE: Aim of this retrospective, observational study is to describe features of a population sample, affected by primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in order to evaluate damage progression on the basis of the emerged individual risk factors. METHODS: We included 190 caucasian patients (377 eyes), evaluating relationship between individual risk factors (explicative variables) and MD (Mean Deviation) of standard automated perimetry. We also considered the dependent variable NFI (Neural Fiber Index) of GDx scanning laser polarimetry. Progression has been evaluated through a statistic General Linear Model on four follow up steps (mean follow up 79 months). RESULTS: Factors reaching statistical significance, determining a worsening of the MD variable, are: age (P<0.0001), intraocular pressure (IOP) at follow up (P < 0.0001), female gender (P<0.0001), hypertension (P< 0.0001) and familiarity (P = 0.0006). Factors reaching statistical significance, determining a worsening of the NFI variable, are only IOP at follow up (P = 0.0159) and depression (P = 0.0104). CONCLUSION: Results of this study confirm and enforce data coming from most recent studies: IOP remains the main risk factor for glaucoma assess and progression; age and familiarity are great risk factors as underlined in the last decades; female sex can be an important risk factors as emerged only in the last years; arterial hypertension should always be evaluated in timing of our clinic follow up. KEYWORDS: Epidemiology; glaucoma; intraocular pressure (IOP); optic nerve; progression; risk factors; visual field

Risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) progression: A study ruled in Torino

ACTIS, ALESSANDRO GUIDO;VERSINO, Elisabetta;BROGLIATTI, Beatrice;ROLLE, Teresa
Last
2016-01-01

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE: Aim of this retrospective, observational study is to describe features of a population sample, affected by primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in order to evaluate damage progression on the basis of the emerged individual risk factors. METHODS: We included 190 caucasian patients (377 eyes), evaluating relationship between individual risk factors (explicative variables) and MD (Mean Deviation) of standard automated perimetry. We also considered the dependent variable NFI (Neural Fiber Index) of GDx scanning laser polarimetry. Progression has been evaluated through a statistic General Linear Model on four follow up steps (mean follow up 79 months). RESULTS: Factors reaching statistical significance, determining a worsening of the MD variable, are: age (P<0.0001), intraocular pressure (IOP) at follow up (P < 0.0001), female gender (P<0.0001), hypertension (P< 0.0001) and familiarity (P = 0.0006). Factors reaching statistical significance, determining a worsening of the NFI variable, are only IOP at follow up (P = 0.0159) and depression (P = 0.0104). CONCLUSION: Results of this study confirm and enforce data coming from most recent studies: IOP remains the main risk factor for glaucoma assess and progression; age and familiarity are great risk factors as underlined in the last decades; female sex can be an important risk factors as emerged only in the last years; arterial hypertension should always be evaluated in timing of our clinic follow up. KEYWORDS: Epidemiology; glaucoma; intraocular pressure (IOP); optic nerve; progression; risk factors; visual field
2016
10
1
129
139
http://bentham.org/open/toophtj/
Epidemiology; Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure (IOP); Optic nerve; Progression; Risk factors; Visual field; Ophthalmology
Actis, A.G; Versino, E.; Brogliatti, B.; Rolle, T.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
TOOPHTJ-10-129.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 300.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
300.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1604018
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 25
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact