Objective: To highlight clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with patients’ preference in the treatment of depression, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and interpersonal counseling in patients with a major depressive episode. Methods: Patients, recruited from a psychiatric consultation service in the primary care setting, were asked to express their preference for the type of treatment before randomization to one of the 2 intervention arms.Severity of depressive symptoms and functional impairment was assessed using the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale, respectively. Results: A total of 170 patients were evaluated, 87 (51.2%) patients expressed their preference fori nterpersonal counseling and 83 (48.8%) for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Depression severity and treatment preferences howed significant correlations. Preference for interpersonal counseling wa srelated to mild depression and Greater functional impairment, whereas patients with moderate or severe depression were more likely to prefer medication. Remission rates and functional level were not related to treatment preference at the end of the study. Conclusion: Treatment preference is a critical factor, influenced by clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, and further studies are needed to improve its clinical relevance.

Treating depression: what patients want. Findings from a randomized controlled trial in primary care

BELLINO, Silvio;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To highlight clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with patients’ preference in the treatment of depression, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and interpersonal counseling in patients with a major depressive episode. Methods: Patients, recruited from a psychiatric consultation service in the primary care setting, were asked to express their preference for the type of treatment before randomization to one of the 2 intervention arms.Severity of depressive symptoms and functional impairment was assessed using the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale, respectively. Results: A total of 170 patients were evaluated, 87 (51.2%) patients expressed their preference fori nterpersonal counseling and 83 (48.8%) for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Depression severity and treatment preferences howed significant correlations. Preference for interpersonal counseling wa srelated to mild depression and Greater functional impairment, whereas patients with moderate or severe depression were more likely to prefer medication. Remission rates and functional level were not related to treatment preference at the end of the study. Conclusion: Treatment preference is a critical factor, influenced by clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, and further studies are needed to improve its clinical relevance.
2016
57
616
623
http://www.psychosomaticsjournal.com/article/S0033-3182(16)30035-4/pdf
depression, primary care, psychotherapy, antidepressant, interpersonal counseling, preference
Michele Magnani; Anna Sasdelli; Silvio Bellino; Antonello Bellomo; Bernardo Carpiniello; Pierluigi Politi; Marco Menchetti; Domenico Berardi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Magnani, Bellino et al. Treating depression. What patients want. Findings from a RCT in primary care. Psychosomatics 2016.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 124.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
124.81 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Magnani, Bellino et al. Treating depression. What patients want. Psychosomatics 2016. Open access_4aperto.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 327.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
327.45 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1612927
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact