The family Galagidae (African galagos or bushbabies) currently comprises five genera: Euoticus Gray 1872; Galago Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1796; Galagoides Smith, 1833; Otolemur Coquerel, 1859; and Sciurocheirus Gray, 1872, none of which is regarded as monotypic, but some (Euoticus, Otolemur) certainly qualify as oligotypic. We argue that a sixth genus needs to be erected if the taxonomy is to reflect galagid evolution accurately. Genetic evidence has consistently demonstrated that the taxa currently referred to the genus Galagoides are not monophyletic, but form two clades (a western and an eastern clade) that do not share an exclusive common ancestor. We review 20 years of genetic studies, from allozyme electrophoresis through to DNA sequence analysis, that support this conclusion. Morphological evidence, however, is not entirely congruent with genetic reconstructions; parallel dwarfing in the two clades has led to convergences in skull size and shape that have complicated the classification of the smaller members of the clades. We present a craniodental morphometric analysis of small-bodied galagid genera that identifies distinguishing characters for the genera, and a comparison of loud call structures to support our proposal that five taxa currently subsumed under the genus Galagoides (Gs cocos, Gs granti, Gs orinus, Gs rondoensis and Gs zanzibaricus) be placed in their own genus, for which we propose the name Paragalago.

A new genus for the eastern dwarf galagos (Primates: Galagidae)

DELPERO, Massimiliano
Co-last
;
2017-01-01

Abstract

The family Galagidae (African galagos or bushbabies) currently comprises five genera: Euoticus Gray 1872; Galago Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1796; Galagoides Smith, 1833; Otolemur Coquerel, 1859; and Sciurocheirus Gray, 1872, none of which is regarded as monotypic, but some (Euoticus, Otolemur) certainly qualify as oligotypic. We argue that a sixth genus needs to be erected if the taxonomy is to reflect galagid evolution accurately. Genetic evidence has consistently demonstrated that the taxa currently referred to the genus Galagoides are not monophyletic, but form two clades (a western and an eastern clade) that do not share an exclusive common ancestor. We review 20 years of genetic studies, from allozyme electrophoresis through to DNA sequence analysis, that support this conclusion. Morphological evidence, however, is not entirely congruent with genetic reconstructions; parallel dwarfing in the two clades has led to convergences in skull size and shape that have complicated the classification of the smaller members of the clades. We present a craniodental morphometric analysis of small-bodied galagid genera that identifies distinguishing characters for the genera, and a comparison of loud call structures to support our proposal that five taxa currently subsumed under the genus Galagoides (Gs cocos, Gs granti, Gs orinus, Gs rondoensis and Gs zanzibaricus) be placed in their own genus, for which we propose the name Paragalago.
2017
181
1
229
241
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/181/1/229/2976136
Bushbaby, Biogeography, Craniodental morphometrics, Galagoides, Paragalago, Molecular phylogeny, Vocalisations
Masters, Judith C.; Génin, Fabien; Couette, Sébastien; Groves, Colin P.; Nash, Stephen D.; Delpero, Massimiliano; Pozzi, Luca
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Paragalago_ZJLS_accepted_4aperto.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 7.73 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.73 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
zlw028.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.63 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1618044
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact