In this paper I argue against two dogmas that I would like to call: “The Two Dogmas of Anthropocentrism”. The first dogma is that is impossibile to conceive an exit strategy to anthropocentrism, the second one is the idea that if we can try to conceive an exit strategy then, this strategy, is anthropocentric also (a sort of second order anthropocentrism). My thesis is that anthropocentrism is a metaphysical system and that the exit strategy is necessary to conceive a real or pure metaphysics. Based on Object-oriented ontology’s (OOO) literature I propose a solution against the two dogmas and I argue in favor of a different kind of metaphysics between ecology (from ontological point of view) and philosophical etology.
I due dogmi dell'antropocentrismo
CAFFO, LEONARDO
2017-01-01
Abstract
In this paper I argue against two dogmas that I would like to call: “The Two Dogmas of Anthropocentrism”. The first dogma is that is impossibile to conceive an exit strategy to anthropocentrism, the second one is the idea that if we can try to conceive an exit strategy then, this strategy, is anthropocentric also (a sort of second order anthropocentrism). My thesis is that anthropocentrism is a metaphysical system and that the exit strategy is necessary to conceive a real or pure metaphysics. Based on Object-oriented ontology’s (OOO) literature I propose a solution against the two dogmas and I argue in favor of a different kind of metaphysics between ecology (from ontological point of view) and philosophical etology.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CAFFO Dogmi (copia autore).pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
252.28 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
252.28 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.