In this chapter I shall analyse the reception, development, and the resulting practical / political implications of antispeciesist moral philosophy and animal ethics in the Italian philosophical tradition since the translation of Animal Liberation by Peter Singer (1991). I shall begin by recalling the successful reception of Singer’s contribution and later of Tom Regan’s, as well as the establishment of the journal Etica & Animali directed by Paola Cavalieri and the first formation of animal welfare organizations. I will then retrace the transformation of activism following what has been called – with a term that I deem to be improper – “political antispeciesism”, articulated on the basis of arguments that combine, in a single set, claims for animal rights and human rights (on the basis of the reception of Nibert 2002). Finally I shall go on to a reconstruction of the contemporary debate, which revolves around the opposition between “weak antispeciesism” – intended to establish the autonomy of antispeciesism from the struggles for human rights – and the aforementioned political antispeciesism. What will emerge from my reconstruction is a different conception of the ideology of dominion over animals, and therefore of speciesism, compared to the ethical model that has come to establish itself as prevailing in Italy.
Speciesism and the Ideology of Domination in the Italian Philosophical Tradition
CAFFO, LEONARDO
2017-01-01
Abstract
In this chapter I shall analyse the reception, development, and the resulting practical / political implications of antispeciesist moral philosophy and animal ethics in the Italian philosophical tradition since the translation of Animal Liberation by Peter Singer (1991). I shall begin by recalling the successful reception of Singer’s contribution and later of Tom Regan’s, as well as the establishment of the journal Etica & Animali directed by Paola Cavalieri and the first formation of animal welfare organizations. I will then retrace the transformation of activism following what has been called – with a term that I deem to be improper – “political antispeciesism”, articulated on the basis of arguments that combine, in a single set, claims for animal rights and human rights (on the basis of the reception of Nibert 2002). Finally I shall go on to a reconstruction of the contemporary debate, which revolves around the opposition between “weak antispeciesism” – intended to establish the autonomy of antispeciesism from the struggles for human rights – and the aforementioned political antispeciesism. What will emerge from my reconstruction is a different conception of the ideology of dominion over animals, and therefore of speciesism, compared to the ethical model that has come to establish itself as prevailing in Italy.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Caffo pallgravemcmillian1.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione
1.78 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.78 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.