In this paper we are going to analyse David R. Cerbone’s exegetical proposal of the wood sellers scenario discussed by Wittgenstein in the Remarks of the Foundation of Mathematics. According to Cerbone, the wood seller scenario is meant to propose a «constitutive view» of logic by demonstrating that our ability to understand alternative concepts is limited. Our claim is that Cerbone’s interpretation, though suggestive, is not well supported by textual evidence. In addition, it is not consistent with Wittgenstein’s repeated suggestions that we can easily understand different conceptual frameworks. And, finally, the conception of human conceptual abilities and linguistic practices that follows from such assumptions is too restrictive. For Wittgenstein, concepts are flexible and extendable units that are applied on the basis of analogies and resemblances. Thus, understanding and describing alternative forms of life is, within certain limits, perfectly possible.

Wittgenstein e i limiti della comprensione

CALZAVARINI, FABRIZIO
2016-01-01

Abstract

In this paper we are going to analyse David R. Cerbone’s exegetical proposal of the wood sellers scenario discussed by Wittgenstein in the Remarks of the Foundation of Mathematics. According to Cerbone, the wood seller scenario is meant to propose a «constitutive view» of logic by demonstrating that our ability to understand alternative concepts is limited. Our claim is that Cerbone’s interpretation, though suggestive, is not well supported by textual evidence. In addition, it is not consistent with Wittgenstein’s repeated suggestions that we can easily understand different conceptual frameworks. And, finally, the conception of human conceptual abilities and linguistic practices that follows from such assumptions is too restrictive. For Wittgenstein, concepts are flexible and extendable units that are applied on the basis of analogies and resemblances. Thus, understanding and describing alternative forms of life is, within certain limits, perfectly possible.
2016
Italiano
Esperti anonimi
CVII
3
327
350
24
no
2 – prodotto con deroga d’ufficio (SOLO se editore non consente/non ha risposto)
262
1
Calzavarini, Fabrizio
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
none
03-CONTRIBUTO IN RIVISTA::03A-Articolo su Rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1632338
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact