What can be inferred from archaeological records leads to think that iconography and kingship were strictly interrelated in the ancient world, the former being the visual language that was used for conveying royal propaganda through different media. This must have been particularly true for the Hellenistic world, and even more for Seleucid Asia, since Alexander had to face what remained of the monumental apparatus that magnified for centuries the figure of the great Persian kings. While in the Achaemenid empire the king’s image was foremost the “personification” of kingship, after Alexander the situation evolved and become progressively more complex.
Aspects of Seleucid Iconography and Kinghsip
MESSINA, Vito
2017-01-01
Abstract
What can be inferred from archaeological records leads to think that iconography and kingship were strictly interrelated in the ancient world, the former being the visual language that was used for conveying royal propaganda through different media. This must have been particularly true for the Hellenistic world, and even more for Seleucid Asia, since Alexander had to face what remained of the monumental apparatus that magnified for centuries the figure of the great Persian kings. While in the Achaemenid empire the king’s image was foremost the “personification” of kingship, after Alexander the situation evolved and become progressively more complex.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2 - Messina.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
7.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.