Context. The role of spatial and environmental processes governing community structure are dependent on the spatial distances among local communities and the degree of habitat heterogeneity at a given spatial scale. Also, they depend on the dispersal ability of the targeted organisms collected throughout a landscape window. Objectives. Here we assessed the relative importance of spatial and environmental factors shaping edaphic (Collembola) and epigeous (Carabidae) communities at different scales. Methods. The sampling sites were four different landscape windows (1km2 square each) in a Mediterranean cork-oak landscape in Portugal. Variance partitioning methods were used to disentangle the relative effects of spatial variables (MEMs, e.g. patch size, shape and configuration) and environmental variables across spatial scales (habitat: data on % of vegetation cover types; management: data on forestry and pasture interventions; landscape: data on landscape metrics). Results. The relative effects of environmental and spatial factors at different scales varied between Collembola and Carabidae. The pure effect of the environmental component was only significant for carabid beetles and explained a higher percentage of their community variance compared to to collembolan communities. The pure effects of the spatial component were generally higher than the environmental component for both groups of soil fauna. Carabid communities responded to landscape features related to the patch connectivity of open areas (grasslands) as well as the shape of cork-oak habitat patches integrating the agro-forest mosaic. Conclusions. Community patterns of surface-dwelling soil fauna may be partly predicted by some features of the landscape, while soil-dwelling communities require ecological assessments at finer spatial scales.

Soil fauna through the landscape window: factors shaping surface-and soil-dwelling communities across spatial scales in cork-oak mosaics

CHAMBERLAIN, Daniel Edward;
2015-01-01

Abstract

Context. The role of spatial and environmental processes governing community structure are dependent on the spatial distances among local communities and the degree of habitat heterogeneity at a given spatial scale. Also, they depend on the dispersal ability of the targeted organisms collected throughout a landscape window. Objectives. Here we assessed the relative importance of spatial and environmental factors shaping edaphic (Collembola) and epigeous (Carabidae) communities at different scales. Methods. The sampling sites were four different landscape windows (1km2 square each) in a Mediterranean cork-oak landscape in Portugal. Variance partitioning methods were used to disentangle the relative effects of spatial variables (MEMs, e.g. patch size, shape and configuration) and environmental variables across spatial scales (habitat: data on % of vegetation cover types; management: data on forestry and pasture interventions; landscape: data on landscape metrics). Results. The relative effects of environmental and spatial factors at different scales varied between Collembola and Carabidae. The pure effect of the environmental component was only significant for carabid beetles and explained a higher percentage of their community variance compared to to collembolan communities. The pure effects of the spatial component were generally higher than the environmental component for both groups of soil fauna. Carabid communities responded to landscape features related to the patch connectivity of open areas (grasslands) as well as the shape of cork-oak habitat patches integrating the agro-forest mosaic. Conclusions. Community patterns of surface-dwelling soil fauna may be partly predicted by some features of the landscape, while soil-dwelling communities require ecological assessments at finer spatial scales.
2015
30
8
1511
1526
http://www.springerlink.com/content/103025/
Carabidae; Collembola; Community structure; Dispersal ability; Environmental factors; Landscape metrics; Mediterranean region; Multiscale analysis; Spatial modelling; Variance partitioning; Geography, Planning and Development; Ecology; Nature and Landscape Conservation
Martins da Silva, Pedro; Berg, Matty P.; da Silva, António Alves; Dias, Susana; Leitão, Pedro J.; Chamberlain, Dan; Niemelä, Jari; Serrano, Artur R. M.; Sousa, José Paulo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
da Silva et al. 2015.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 619.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
619.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1634679
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact