Innovative approaches aimed at engaging citizens in public policy-making through informed discussion forums are spreading in many countries. These processes are often designed and managed by public participation professionals (PPPs). Designing such processes is both a delicate and a relevant activity as it affects not only the quality of the processes and their legitimacy, but also their capacity to actually exert an impact on decision making. The present chapter offers an overview of the public participation field in a national context—Italy—that is particularly interesting not only because PPPs have been increasing in numbers over the last decade, but also because two Italian regions (Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna) have institutionalized public participation through ad hoc laws to foster, fund and regulate the public participation field. The chapter addresses two main questions. The first concerns the black box of facilitation: which criteria, standards, approaches and methods do Italian PPPs use? The second addresses the factors that affect PPPs’ work: how do political, social and institutional factors affect PPPs’ work? The findings are based on semi-structured interviews conducted with PPPs who designed and managed participatory processes.

Innovating public participation. The role of PPPs and institutions in Italy

RAVAZZI, STEFANIA
2017-01-01

Abstract

Innovative approaches aimed at engaging citizens in public policy-making through informed discussion forums are spreading in many countries. These processes are often designed and managed by public participation professionals (PPPs). Designing such processes is both a delicate and a relevant activity as it affects not only the quality of the processes and their legitimacy, but also their capacity to actually exert an impact on decision making. The present chapter offers an overview of the public participation field in a national context—Italy—that is particularly interesting not only because PPPs have been increasing in numbers over the last decade, but also because two Italian regions (Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna) have institutionalized public participation through ad hoc laws to foster, fund and regulate the public participation field. The chapter addresses two main questions. The first concerns the black box of facilitation: which criteria, standards, approaches and methods do Italian PPPs use? The second addresses the factors that affect PPPs’ work: how do political, social and institutional factors affect PPPs’ work? The findings are based on semi-structured interviews conducted with PPPs who designed and managed participatory processes.
2017
The professionalization of the public participation field
Routledge
17
39
978-1-138-63811-2
participation, deliberation, law, democracy, innovation
Lewanski, R.; Ravazzi,
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lewanski Ravazzi Revised June 23.docx

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Bozza non ancora revisionata per la stampa finale
Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 200.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
200.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
ravazzi.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 4.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.21 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1637393
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact