Background: Depression screening in the cardiovascular disease (CVD) care setting is under-performed, also be- cause the issue of the optimal screening tools cut-off is still open. We analysed which HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) total score cut-off value shows the best properties in two groups of 357 Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and 260 Chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) hospitalized patients. Methods: A Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was plotted for both groups using the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as the criterion. Accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were computed for different cut-off scores. Results: The ROC curves confirmed the excellent/very good accuracy of the HADS in both groups, with an area under the curve of 0.911 for the ACS and 0.893 for the CAD patients. The cut-off of 14 showed the best compro- mise between high sensitivity and good specificity in both groups, with high negative predicted values (95.5% and 92.4%, respectively). Conclusion: Using a cut-off value of 14, the HADS could be considered a good screening tool to identify hospital- ized CAD and ACS patients requiring a more accurate depression assessment, in order to promptly plan the most appropriate treatment strategies and prevent the negative effects of depression in CVD patients.

Screening of depression in cardiology: A study on 617 cardiovascular patients

TESIO, VALENTINA;TORTA, Riccardo;GAITA, Fiorenzo;CASTELLI, Lorys
2017-01-01

Abstract

Background: Depression screening in the cardiovascular disease (CVD) care setting is under-performed, also be- cause the issue of the optimal screening tools cut-off is still open. We analysed which HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) total score cut-off value shows the best properties in two groups of 357 Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and 260 Chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) hospitalized patients. Methods: A Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was plotted for both groups using the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as the criterion. Accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were computed for different cut-off scores. Results: The ROC curves confirmed the excellent/very good accuracy of the HADS in both groups, with an area under the curve of 0.911 for the ACS and 0.893 for the CAD patients. The cut-off of 14 showed the best compro- mise between high sensitivity and good specificity in both groups, with high negative predicted values (95.5% and 92.4%, respectively). Conclusion: Using a cut-off value of 14, the HADS could be considered a good screening tool to identify hospital- ized CAD and ACS patients requiring a more accurate depression assessment, in order to promptly plan the most appropriate treatment strategies and prevent the negative effects of depression in CVD patients.
2017
245
49
51
Cardiovascular disease, Depression, Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome, HADS, Screening
Tesio, Valentina; Marra, Sebastiano; Molinaro, Stefania; Torta, Riccardo; Gaita, Fiorenzo; Castelli, Lorys
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Manuscript_PrePrint_4aperto.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: PrePrint
Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 374.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
374.77 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Manuscript_PostPrint_4aperto.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: PostPrint
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 377.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
377.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Tesio_Screening of depression in cardiology_A study on 617 cardiovascular patients_2017.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: PDF EDITORIALE
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 186.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
186.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1645522
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact