Abstract AIM: To show that an increased correlation between CpGs after selection through an epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) might translate into biased replication results. METHODS: Pairwise correlation coefficients between CpGs selected in two published EWAS, the top hits replication, Bonferroni p-values, Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) false discovery rate (FDR) and directional FDR r-values were calculated in the NINFEA cohort data. Exposures' random permutations were performed to show the empirical p-value distributions. RESULTS: The average pairwise correlation coefficients between CpGs were enhanced after selection for the replication (e.g., from 0.12 at genome-wide level to 0.26 among the selected CpGs), affecting the empirical p-value distributions and the usual multiple testing control. CONCLUSION: Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR are inappropriate for the EWAS replication phase, and methods that account for the underlying correlation need to be used.

Increased correlation between methylation sites in epigenome-wide replication studies: impact on analysis and results.

Popovic M;Fasanelli F;Fiano V;Biggeri A;Richiardi L.
Last
2017-01-01

Abstract

Abstract AIM: To show that an increased correlation between CpGs after selection through an epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) might translate into biased replication results. METHODS: Pairwise correlation coefficients between CpGs selected in two published EWAS, the top hits replication, Bonferroni p-values, Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) false discovery rate (FDR) and directional FDR r-values were calculated in the NINFEA cohort data. Exposures' random permutations were performed to show the empirical p-value distributions. RESULTS: The average pairwise correlation coefficients between CpGs were enhanced after selection for the replication (e.g., from 0.12 at genome-wide level to 0.26 among the selected CpGs), affecting the empirical p-value distributions and the usual multiple testing control. CONCLUSION: Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR are inappropriate for the EWAS replication phase, and methods that account for the underlying correlation need to be used.
2017
1489
1502
EWAS; bias; correlation; discovery study; epigenetics; replication study
Popovic M, Fasanelli F, Fiano V, Biggeri A, Richiardi L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pubmed_29106300.pdf

Open Access dal 02/01/2019

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 1.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.4 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1652237
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact