Firm performance in turbulent business environments strongly depends on the adaptive (re)generation of the firm's business model. However, studies on the enablers of business model innovation are sparse. This study leverages the literature on dynamic capabilities, on organizational ambidexterity/vacillation, and Lewis's view of organizational paradoxes to build an integrated model of organizational dynamism that includes seven dimensions: three pairs of paradoxical constructs (cooperation-competition, exploration-exploitation, and conformity-agency) and dynamic capabilities. The study posits that these seven dimensions of organizational dynamism describe the key enablers of adaptive business model innovation (ABMI). The results of applying a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to 35 selected cases confirm that the paradoxical dimensions of organizational dynamism, although logically opposed, strongly intertwine in enabling the adaptive (re)generation of a firm's business model. Further, this article highlights fsQCA's suitability to test models that include paradoxical constructs.

Firm performance in turbulent business environments strongly depends on the adaptive (re)generation of the firm's business model. However, studies on the enablers of business model innovation are sparse. This study le- verages the literature on dynamic capabilities, on organizational ambidexterity/vacillation, and Lewis's view of organizational paradoxes to build an integrated model of organizational dynamism that includes seven dimen- sions: three pairs of paradoxical constructs (cooperation–competition, exploration–exploitation, and conformi- ty–agency) and dynamic capabilities. The study posits that these seven dimensions of organizational dynamism describe the key enablers of adaptive business model innovation (ABMI). The results of applying a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to 35 selected cases confirm that the paradoxical dimensions of organizational dynamism, although logically opposed, strongly intertwine in enabling the adaptive (re)gener- ation of a firm's businessmodel. Further, this article highlights fsQCA's suitability to testmodels that include paradoxical constructs.

Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model innovation: The triple paradox configuration

RICCIARDI, FRANCESCA;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Firm performance in turbulent business environments strongly depends on the adaptive (re)generation of the firm's business model. However, studies on the enablers of business model innovation are sparse. This study le- verages the literature on dynamic capabilities, on organizational ambidexterity/vacillation, and Lewis's view of organizational paradoxes to build an integrated model of organizational dynamism that includes seven dimen- sions: three pairs of paradoxical constructs (cooperation–competition, exploration–exploitation, and conformi- ty–agency) and dynamic capabilities. The study posits that these seven dimensions of organizational dynamism describe the key enablers of adaptive business model innovation (ABMI). The results of applying a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to 35 selected cases confirm that the paradoxical dimensions of organizational dynamism, although logically opposed, strongly intertwine in enabling the adaptive (re)gener- ation of a firm's businessmodel. Further, this article highlights fsQCA's suitability to testmodels that include paradoxical constructs.
2016
69
11
5487
5493
Adaptive organizational learning; Ambidexterity; Coopetition; Dual tuning; Embedded agency; Organizational vacillation; Paradoxical management; adaptive organizational learning
Firm performance in turbulent business environments strongly depends on the adaptive (re)generation of the firm's business model. However, studies on the enablers of business model innovation are sparse. This study leverages the literature on dynamic capabilities, on organizational ambidexterity/vacillation, and Lewis's view of organizational paradoxes to build an integrated model of organizational dynamism that includes seven dimensions: three pairs of paradoxical constructs (cooperation-competition, exploration-exploitation, and conformity-agency) and dynamic capabilities. The study posits that these seven dimensions of organizational dynamism describe the key enablers of adaptive business model innovation (ABMI). The results of applying a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to 35 selected cases confirm that the paradoxical dimensions of organizational dynamism, although logically opposed, strongly intertwine in enabling the adaptive (re)generation of a firm's business model. Further, this article highlights fsQCA's suitability to test models that include paradoxical constructs.
Ricciardi, Francesca; Zardini, Alessandro; Rossignoli, Cecilia
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ricciardi, Zardini, Rossignoli - 2016 - Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model innovation The triple paradox configuration.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 483.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
483.78 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
CLEAN-Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model innovation_The triple paradox configuration.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 1.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.07 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1656466
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 98
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 80
social impact