The article aims at a comparative view of the ways in which the issue of categories was dealt with in the context of classic linguistic philosophy, both in the ideal language and in the ordi- nary language tradition. different ways of conceiving of categories are seen to be associated with different outlooks as to the method of (linguistic) philosophy. Some paradigmatic cas- es are examined: Gustav Bergmann, Rudolf Carnap, Willard Van Orman Quine, Gilbert Ryle. contrasts as well as interferences among their views are taken into account.

Le categorie tra linguaggio ideale e linguaggio ordinario

Guido Bonino
2017

Abstract

The article aims at a comparative view of the ways in which the issue of categories was dealt with in the context of classic linguistic philosophy, both in the ideal language and in the ordi- nary language tradition. different ways of conceiving of categories are seen to be associated with different outlooks as to the method of (linguistic) philosophy. Some paradigmatic cas- es are examined: Gustav Bergmann, Rudolf Carnap, Willard Van Orman Quine, Gilbert Ryle. contrasts as well as interferences among their views are taken into account.
109
3
651
669
http://filosofianeoscolastica.vitaepensiero.it/scheda-articolo_digital/guido-bonino/le-categorie-tra-linguaggio-ideale-e-linguaggio-ordinario-001050_2017_0003_0651-345633.html
Categories; Ideal Language; Ordinary Language; Gustav Bergmann
Guido, Bonino
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Le categorie tra linguaggio ideale e linguaggio ordinario.pdf

non disponibili

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 272.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
272.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1657353
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact