The article aims at a comparative view of the ways in which the issue of categories was dealt with in the context of classic linguistic philosophy, both in the ideal language and in the ordi- nary language tradition. different ways of conceiving of categories are seen to be associated with different outlooks as to the method of (linguistic) philosophy. Some paradigmatic cas- es are examined: Gustav Bergmann, Rudolf Carnap, Willard Van Orman Quine, Gilbert Ryle. contrasts as well as interferences among their views are taken into account.
Le categorie tra linguaggio ideale e linguaggio ordinario
Guido Bonino
2017-01-01
Abstract
The article aims at a comparative view of the ways in which the issue of categories was dealt with in the context of classic linguistic philosophy, both in the ideal language and in the ordi- nary language tradition. different ways of conceiving of categories are seen to be associated with different outlooks as to the method of (linguistic) philosophy. Some paradigmatic cas- es are examined: Gustav Bergmann, Rudolf Carnap, Willard Van Orman Quine, Gilbert Ryle. contrasts as well as interferences among their views are taken into account.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Le categorie tra linguaggio ideale e linguaggio ordinario.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
272.21 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
272.21 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.