Abstract BACKGROUND: Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a relevant problem for breast cancer survivors (BCSs), in particular for those who receive aromatase inhibitors (AIs). We conducted a survey, to assess the attitude of oncologists toward the diagnosis and treatment of VVA in BCSs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2015, 120 computer-assisted Web interviews were performed among breast oncologists. RESULTS: According to oncologists' perceptions, 60% of postmenopausal BCSs and 39.4% of premenopausal BCSs will suffer from VVA. Despite that none of the physicians considered VVA as a transient event or a secondary problem in BCSs, only half of the oncologists (48%) directly illustrated VVA to the patients as a possible consequence. Forty-one percent of the oncologists refer BCSs to gynaecologist to define VVA treatment, whereas 35.1% manages it alone. Nonhormonal treatments are preferred by most oncologists (71%). The main reason not to prescribe vaginal estrogen therapy in BCSs is the fear of increased cancer recurrence, the possible interference with tamoxifen, or AIs and the fear of medical litigation. CONCLUSION: VVA is a relevant problem for BCSs. Great effort should be done to correctly inform health care providers about VVA problems and on the different possible available treatments.

Vaginal Atrophy in Breast Cancer Survivors: Attitude and Approaches Among Oncologists

Biglia Nicoletta
First
;
Bounous Valentina Elisabetta;D’Alonzo Marta;OTTINO, Laura;Tuninetti Valentina;ROBBA, ELISABETTA;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a relevant problem for breast cancer survivors (BCSs), in particular for those who receive aromatase inhibitors (AIs). We conducted a survey, to assess the attitude of oncologists toward the diagnosis and treatment of VVA in BCSs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2015, 120 computer-assisted Web interviews were performed among breast oncologists. RESULTS: According to oncologists' perceptions, 60% of postmenopausal BCSs and 39.4% of premenopausal BCSs will suffer from VVA. Despite that none of the physicians considered VVA as a transient event or a secondary problem in BCSs, only half of the oncologists (48%) directly illustrated VVA to the patients as a possible consequence. Forty-one percent of the oncologists refer BCSs to gynaecologist to define VVA treatment, whereas 35.1% manages it alone. Nonhormonal treatments are preferred by most oncologists (71%). The main reason not to prescribe vaginal estrogen therapy in BCSs is the fear of increased cancer recurrence, the possible interference with tamoxifen, or AIs and the fear of medical litigation. CONCLUSION: VVA is a relevant problem for BCSs. Great effort should be done to correctly inform health care providers about VVA problems and on the different possible available treatments.
2017
17
8
611
617
breast cancer, vulvovaginal atrophy, quality of life, survivors
Biglia Nicoletta, Bounous Valentina Elisabetta, D’Alonzo Marta, Ottino Laura, Tuninetti Valentina, Robba Elisabetta, Perrone Tania
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vaginal Atrophy in Breast Cancer Survivors.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 602.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
602.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S1526820917300952-main.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 573.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
573.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1660011
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact