Background: This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib. Patients and methods: ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n=72; chemotherapy, n=35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.9–12.2) with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.15 [95% CI: 0.08–0.29]; P<0.001). Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib (HR 0.32 [95% CI: 0.17–0.59]; median PFS was 7.1 months [95% CI: 6.3–10.8] with alectinib and 1.6 months [95% CI: 1.3–4.1] with chemotherapy). In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n=24; chemotherapy, n=16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P<0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 versus 6.0 weeks). Conclusion: Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750

Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study

S. Novello
First
;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib. Patients and methods: ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n=72; chemotherapy, n=35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.9–12.2) with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.15 [95% CI: 0.08–0.29]; P<0.001). Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib (HR 0.32 [95% CI: 0.17–0.59]; median PFS was 7.1 months [95% CI: 6.3–10.8] with alectinib and 1.6 months [95% CI: 1.3–4.1] with chemotherapy). In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n=24; chemotherapy, n=16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P<0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 versus 6.0 weeks). Conclusion: Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750
2018
29
06
1409
1416
S. Novello, J. Mazières, I.-J. Oh, J. de Castro, M. R. Migliorino, Å. Helland, R. Dziadziuszko, F. Griesinger, A. Kotb, A. Zeaiter, A. Cardona, B. Bal...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Novello_ALUR primary manuscript_6Mar2018_revised_track changes.docx

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 334.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
334.84 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
mdy121.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 610.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
610.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1664051
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 139
  • Scopus 260
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 223
social impact