The paper explores the issues dealt with in Artt. 39 of the EU TM Directive and 28 of the EUTMR in the light of the previous case law of the ECJ (in the 2012 IP Translator and the 2017 Lambretta case) and of the General Court (in the 2014 Lambretta case) as well as of the various Communications issued by the EUIPO. A discussion follows of the outstanding open questions, including the impact of the new rules on the interpretation and application of the Nice Agreement.
Deposito ed identificazione dei prodotti e servizi
Marco Ricolfi
2017-01-01
Abstract
The paper explores the issues dealt with in Artt. 39 of the EU TM Directive and 28 of the EUTMR in the light of the previous case law of the ECJ (in the 2012 IP Translator and the 2017 Lambretta case) and of the General Court (in the 2014 Lambretta case) as well as of the various Communications issued by the EUIPO. A discussion follows of the outstanding open questions, including the impact of the new rules on the interpretation and application of the Nice Agreement.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
aida17def.doc
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipo di file:
PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione
5.33 MB
Formato
Microsoft Word
|
5.33 MB | Microsoft Word | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
