Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common disorder. Despite innovation in diagnostic tools and therapeutic options, a significant proportion of failures still remains. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent a multidisciplinary board evaluation at our Division. Moreover, we analyzed the impact of this approach to OSAS on the success rate of surgical procedures and oral appliances. METHODS: Between June 2010 and May 2015, 893 patients with OSAS were evaluated at our Department. All the patients underwent a complete physical examination and fiberoptic pharyngolaryngoscopy with Müller test. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) was suggested for patients who refused or failed continuous positive airway pressure (CRAP) therapy. Then, the patients underwent an evaluation by a multidisciplinary board to identify the best treatment. Surgical procedures and mandibular advancement devices (MAD) were the main options proposed to the patients. RESULTS: DISE was performed in 133 cases and 119 of them (89.5%) were evaluated by the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a neurologist, an otolaryngologist, a maxillofacial surgeon and a orthodontist. Success rate was 74.2% for otorhinolaryngological procedures, 91.7% for maxillofacial procedures, and 66.7% for combined ones. Thus, success rate for surgical treatment was 78.3%, while oral appliances had a 93.3% of success. The global success rate was 82.0%. CONCLUSIONS: DISE and multidisciplinary board evaluation allow to achieve a patient-tailored treatment with an high success rate. They should be introduced in routine daily practice for patients with OSAS who failed or refused ventilatory therapy

Multidisciplinary management of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Gervasio, Carmine F.;Gerbino, Giovanni;Riva, Giuseppe;Schellino, Eleonora;Cicolin, Alessandro;Caranzano, Federico;FRIGIOLINI, FRANCESCA MARIA ELENA;Giordano, Pamela;Defilippi, Simona;PIUMETTO, Elena;Pecorari, Giancarlo;Albera, Roberto
Last
2018-01-01

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common disorder. Despite innovation in diagnostic tools and therapeutic options, a significant proportion of failures still remains. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent a multidisciplinary board evaluation at our Division. Moreover, we analyzed the impact of this approach to OSAS on the success rate of surgical procedures and oral appliances. METHODS: Between June 2010 and May 2015, 893 patients with OSAS were evaluated at our Department. All the patients underwent a complete physical examination and fiberoptic pharyngolaryngoscopy with Müller test. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) was suggested for patients who refused or failed continuous positive airway pressure (CRAP) therapy. Then, the patients underwent an evaluation by a multidisciplinary board to identify the best treatment. Surgical procedures and mandibular advancement devices (MAD) were the main options proposed to the patients. RESULTS: DISE was performed in 133 cases and 119 of them (89.5%) were evaluated by the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a neurologist, an otolaryngologist, a maxillofacial surgeon and a orthodontist. Success rate was 74.2% for otorhinolaryngological procedures, 91.7% for maxillofacial procedures, and 66.7% for combined ones. Thus, success rate for surgical treatment was 78.3%, while oral appliances had a 93.3% of success. The global success rate was 82.0%. CONCLUSIONS: DISE and multidisciplinary board evaluation allow to achieve a patient-tailored treatment with an high success rate. They should be introduced in routine daily practice for patients with OSAS who failed or refused ventilatory therapy
2018
68
2
51
57
https://www.minervamedica.it/en/getfreepdf/f3KAWu1BmlSlgwTEPbuea%252FLYS%252B1QHu%252B8%252FOu5s%252BrxJhHe4JlAhOQ%252BjBxq4VD0e3qONWDDy4zMrvDczjD7rM3YcQ%253D%253D/R27Y2018N02A0051.pdf
Endoscopy; Obstructive; Sleep apnea; Surgery; Otorhinolaryngology2734 Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Gervasio, Carmine F.; Gerbino, Giovanni; Riva, Giuseppe*; Schellino, Eleonora; Cicolin, Alessandro; Caranzano, Federico; Frigiolini, Francesca; Giorda...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Multidisciplinary management.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 711.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
711.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1676990
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact