The recent judgement about Foodora riders (Court of Turin, judgement no. 778/2018) has considered the so called Gig Economy workers as self-employed people. The decision is based on the their freedom to choose to work or not work. The Court doesn’t make any reference to Constitution and in this way it seems to share the principle of the equivalence of all works. The A. inquires whether the Court should have considered the real context of the Gig Economy and the Constitutional prohibition to consider all works as equal.
La libertà dei fattorini di non lavorare e il silenzio sulla Costituzione: note in margine alla sentenza Foodora (Tribunale di Torino, sentenza n. 778 del 2018)
Massa Pinto Ilenia
2018-01-01
Abstract
The recent judgement about Foodora riders (Court of Turin, judgement no. 778/2018) has considered the so called Gig Economy workers as self-employed people. The decision is based on the their freedom to choose to work or not work. The Court doesn’t make any reference to Constitution and in this way it seems to share the principle of the equivalence of all works. The A. inquires whether the Court should have considered the real context of the Gig Economy and the Constitutional prohibition to consider all works as equal.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Foodora.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
303.68 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
303.68 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.