Purpose of review To describe how to better identify frail multiple myeloma patients and to treat them appropriately. Recent findings Proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, have significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma patients in the last decade. However, both in clinical trials and in daily clinical practice, elderly multiple myeloma patients have shown lesser benefit. This is mainly due to less stringent use of proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs, increased toxicity, and subsequent early discontinuation of therapy in elderly. Summary Multiple myeloma typically affects elderly patients. Approximately one-Third of patients are older than 75 years at diagnosis. Moreover, at least 30% are frail, both due to disease-related symptoms and (agerelated) decline in physical capacity, presence of comorbidities, frailty, polypharmacy, nutritional status, and cognitive impairment. Treatment regimens that are investigated in clinical trials for transplant-ineligible patients have largely been investigated in fit, rather than frail patients, the latter being typically excluded or highly underrepresented therein. Data on the feasibility and efficacy of current standards of care are therefore lacking in frail patients. Preliminary data suggest a higher toxicity and discontinuation rate, loss of efficacy, and impaired quality of life in frail patients. Geriatric assessment helps to identify frail patients according to their functional and cognitive status. Both the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)-frailty index and Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index constitute recently proposed algorithms that easily identify intermediate-fit and frail patients. Ongoing and future clinical trials, specifically designed for frail patients, will hopefully define frailty-directed treatment selection.

Elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Towards a frailty approach?

Alessandra Larocca
Last
2017-01-01

Abstract

Purpose of review To describe how to better identify frail multiple myeloma patients and to treat them appropriately. Recent findings Proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, have significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma patients in the last decade. However, both in clinical trials and in daily clinical practice, elderly multiple myeloma patients have shown lesser benefit. This is mainly due to less stringent use of proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs, increased toxicity, and subsequent early discontinuation of therapy in elderly. Summary Multiple myeloma typically affects elderly patients. Approximately one-Third of patients are older than 75 years at diagnosis. Moreover, at least 30% are frail, both due to disease-related symptoms and (agerelated) decline in physical capacity, presence of comorbidities, frailty, polypharmacy, nutritional status, and cognitive impairment. Treatment regimens that are investigated in clinical trials for transplant-ineligible patients have largely been investigated in fit, rather than frail patients, the latter being typically excluded or highly underrepresented therein. Data on the feasibility and efficacy of current standards of care are therefore lacking in frail patients. Preliminary data suggest a higher toxicity and discontinuation rate, loss of efficacy, and impaired quality of life in frail patients. Geriatric assessment helps to identify frail patients according to their functional and cognitive status. Both the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)-frailty index and Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index constitute recently proposed algorithms that easily identify intermediate-fit and frail patients. Ongoing and future clinical trials, specifically designed for frail patients, will hopefully define frailty-directed treatment selection.
2017
29
5
315
321
https://journals.lww.com/co-oncology/Abstract/2017/09000/Elderly_patients_with_multiple_myeloma__towards_a.3.aspx
https://doi.org/10.1097/cco.0000000000000395
Elderly; Frailty; Geriatric Assessment; International Myeloma Working Group-Frailty Index; Multiple Myeloma; Revised-Myeloma Comorbidity Index; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Frail Elderly; Geriatric Assessment; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Oncology; Cancer Research
Sonja Zweegman, Monika Engelhardt, Alessandra Larocca
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
[Published Vsn] Zweegman et al - 2017 - Elderly patients with multiple myeloma_ towards a frailty approach_.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: [Restricted access - Published Vsn.] Zweegman S et al. Curr Opin Oncol . 2017 Sep;29(5):315-321. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000395. © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/co-oncology/Abstract/2017/09000/Elderly_patients_with_multiple_myeloma__towards_a.3.aspx | https://doi.org/10.1097/cco.0000000000000395
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 164.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
164.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
[Author Vsn] Zweegman et al - Elderly Patients with multiple myeloma - 2017 b.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: [Restricted access - Author Vsn.] Zweegman S et al. Curr Opin Oncol . 2017 Sep;29(5):315-321. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000395. © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This it is not the final published version. The published version is available at: https://journals.lww.com/co-oncology/Abstract/2017/09000/Elderly_patients_with_multiple_myeloma__towards_a.3.aspx | https://doi.org/10.1097/cco.0000000000000395
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 322.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
322.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1678706
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 41
  • Scopus 78
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 76
social impact