The diagnosis of multiple myeloma can be challenging, even for experienced physicians, and requires close collaboration between multiple disciplines (orthopedics, radiology, nuclear medicine, radiation therapy, hematology and oncology) before the final diagnosis of myeloma is made. The definition of multiple myeloma is based on the presence of clinical, biochemical, histo-pathological, and radiological disease markers. At presentation and during follow-up, specific tests are needed for exact disease characterization and correct diagnosis. These tests can also serve as prognostic markers and are useful for follow-up of a myeloma patient. In addition, molecular analyses remain pivotal for defining high-risk myeloma and are used in updated patient stratifications, while minimal residual disease assessment via flow cytometry, molecular techniques and radiological approaches allow to acquire additional prognostic information on patients' long-term outcome. This pivotal information will guide our future treatment decisions in forthcoming clinical trials. The European Myeloma Network group here updated their guidelines on different diagnostic recommendations, which should be of value to allow their appropriate use both at diagnosis and follow-up.

European Myeloma Network recommendations on tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma: what to use and when

Francesca Gay;Alessandra Larocca;Mario Boccadoro;
2018-01-01

Abstract

The diagnosis of multiple myeloma can be challenging, even for experienced physicians, and requires close collaboration between multiple disciplines (orthopedics, radiology, nuclear medicine, radiation therapy, hematology and oncology) before the final diagnosis of myeloma is made. The definition of multiple myeloma is based on the presence of clinical, biochemical, histo-pathological, and radiological disease markers. At presentation and during follow-up, specific tests are needed for exact disease characterization and correct diagnosis. These tests can also serve as prognostic markers and are useful for follow-up of a myeloma patient. In addition, molecular analyses remain pivotal for defining high-risk myeloma and are used in updated patient stratifications, while minimal residual disease assessment via flow cytometry, molecular techniques and radiological approaches allow to acquire additional prognostic information on patients' long-term outcome. This pivotal information will guide our future treatment decisions in forthcoming clinical trials. The European Myeloma Network group here updated their guidelines on different diagnostic recommendations, which should be of value to allow their appropriate use both at diagnosis and follow-up.
2018
103
11
1772
1784
https://haematologica.org/article/view/8655
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.189159
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6278986/
Cytogenetics; Diagnosis; Minimal Residual Disease; Monitoring; Multiple Myeloma
Jo Caers, Laurent Garderet, K. Martin Kortüm, Michael E. O'Dwyer, Niels W.C.J. van de Donk, Mascha Binder, Sandra Maria Dold, Francesca Gay, Jill Corr...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Haematolgica_1678712.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: [Published Vsn.] Caers J et al. Haematologica. 2018 Nov;103(11):1772-1784. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.189159. Epub 2018 Aug 31. PMID: 30171031; PMCID: PMC6278986. ©2018 Ferrata Storti Foundation. Available at: https://haematologica.org/article/view/8655 | https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.189159 | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6278986/
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 426.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
426.45 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1678712
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 46
  • Scopus 103
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 84
social impact