Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and soft tissue rebound following Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery (FibReORS) and Osseous Resective Surgery (ORS) over a 48-month period. Materials and Methods: Thirteen chronic periodontitis patients, displaying two contra-lateral posterior sextants with residual intrabony defects ≤3 mm in single-rooted or multi-rooted teeth with no or grade I furcation involvement, were treated in a split-mouth study model. ORS procedure was randomly applied on one side, while FibReORS on the contra-lateral side. Clinical measurements were recorded at 12 and 48 months after surgery. Results: All 13 patients were available for the 48-month recall. At this time point, probing depth (PD) and keratinized tissue changes did not significantly differ between treatments. FibReORS-treated sites exhibited less gingival recession than ORS-treated sextants (2.1 ± 0.3 versus 2.5 ± 0.4 mm, p =.001), but comparable coronal soft tissue rebound. The mean difference of 0.4 ± 0.3 mm was consistent with higher amount of bone resection in the ORS group (0.92 ± 0.11 versus 0.38 ± 0.09 mm, p <.001). Conclusion: FibReORS resulted in similar PD changes and soft tissue rebound compared with ORS in posterior teeth with no or limited furcation involvement.

Soft tissue re-growth after osseous resective surgery with and without fibre retention technique. Four-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

Aimetti, Mario
First
;
Romano, Federica
2018-01-01

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and soft tissue rebound following Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery (FibReORS) and Osseous Resective Surgery (ORS) over a 48-month period. Materials and Methods: Thirteen chronic periodontitis patients, displaying two contra-lateral posterior sextants with residual intrabony defects ≤3 mm in single-rooted or multi-rooted teeth with no or grade I furcation involvement, were treated in a split-mouth study model. ORS procedure was randomly applied on one side, while FibReORS on the contra-lateral side. Clinical measurements were recorded at 12 and 48 months after surgery. Results: All 13 patients were available for the 48-month recall. At this time point, probing depth (PD) and keratinized tissue changes did not significantly differ between treatments. FibReORS-treated sites exhibited less gingival recession than ORS-treated sextants (2.1 ± 0.3 versus 2.5 ± 0.4 mm, p =.001), but comparable coronal soft tissue rebound. The mean difference of 0.4 ± 0.3 mm was consistent with higher amount of bone resection in the ORS group (0.92 ± 0.11 versus 0.38 ± 0.09 mm, p <.001). Conclusion: FibReORS resulted in similar PD changes and soft tissue rebound compared with ORS in posterior teeth with no or limited furcation involvement.
2018
45
3
364
372
www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6979
bone loss/periodontal; gingival recession; periodontitis/surgery; randomized clinical trial; soft tissue; Periodontics
Aimetti, Mario*; Mariani, Giulia Maria; Ercoli, Elena; Audagna, Martina; Romano, Federica
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Aimetti_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Clinical_Periodontology.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Mar;45(3):364-372. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12848. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 656.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
656.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Soft tissue regrowth after FibReORS.pdf

Open Access dal 02/04/2019

Descrizione: Post print
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 4.52 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.52 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1678823
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact