Our goal is to answer one crucial question: what are the core conditions that explain high levels of public health in Latin America? We offer a key contribution to the empirical literature on the policy impact of democracy, by claiming that democracy interacts with other factors to help public health: differences in public health levels in Latin America can be better explained by the interplay of these factors, rather than as the net effect of single institutional conditions. Political regimes have direct and indirect effects on public health. Political oppression is clinically related to mental oppression, which converts into depression and illnesses. Political freedom is often related to mutual respect and self-worth which breed mental satisfaction and health. Indirect effects are based on politicians’ responsiveness to popular needs and accountability mechanisms, which are missing in authoritarian settings. Economic well-being and public expenditures, as well as a more equal income distribution, finally, favor better funded and more efficient health systems. We find that there are at least four different ‘models’ thorough which political and socio-economic conditions exerted an impact on health in different groups of Latin American countries, through varying combinations of factors as democratic governments, prosperity, social equality and generous public health outlays. Yet, one specific combination of factors appears particularly effective: in conjunction with democracy, socio-economic equality represents the most promising arrangement for securing good health results in the area.

Democracy, Equality and Good Public Health: A Fuzzy Set Analysis of Latin America

GRASSI DAVIDE
2018-01-01

Abstract

Our goal is to answer one crucial question: what are the core conditions that explain high levels of public health in Latin America? We offer a key contribution to the empirical literature on the policy impact of democracy, by claiming that democracy interacts with other factors to help public health: differences in public health levels in Latin America can be better explained by the interplay of these factors, rather than as the net effect of single institutional conditions. Political regimes have direct and indirect effects on public health. Political oppression is clinically related to mental oppression, which converts into depression and illnesses. Political freedom is often related to mutual respect and self-worth which breed mental satisfaction and health. Indirect effects are based on politicians’ responsiveness to popular needs and accountability mechanisms, which are missing in authoritarian settings. Economic well-being and public expenditures, as well as a more equal income distribution, finally, favor better funded and more efficient health systems. We find that there are at least four different ‘models’ thorough which political and socio-economic conditions exerted an impact on health in different groups of Latin American countries, through varying combinations of factors as democratic governments, prosperity, social equality and generous public health outlays. Yet, one specific combination of factors appears particularly effective: in conjunction with democracy, socio-economic equality represents the most promising arrangement for securing good health results in the area.
2018
XXV
3
371
397
Latin America, Health, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
GRASSI DAVIDE
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
4Grassi & Luppi.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 463.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
463.13 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1682351
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact