The paper considers the role of international human rights law in regulating artificial reproductive technologies (ART), both from the perspective of the law-making process and of the law interpretation by international human rights courts. In addressing these two profiles, the author explores a double dimension: on the one hand, the limits to ART in order to respect human dignity and/or to protect the embryo; on the other, the need to balance conflicting interests arising from the application of ART. The study reveals that the international law-making process on ART is at a very early stage, while human rights courts play a prominent role in ruling on these technologies. As its case law demonstrates, the European Court of Human Rights elaborates argumentative ploys to back its conclusions. In doing so, it expresses ethical stances capable of influencing the moral debate on divisive topics.

Artificial reproductive technologies and international law: the role of human rights

Poli L.
2018

Abstract

The paper considers the role of international human rights law in regulating artificial reproductive technologies (ART), both from the perspective of the law-making process and of the law interpretation by international human rights courts. In addressing these two profiles, the author explores a double dimension: on the one hand, the limits to ART in order to respect human dignity and/or to protect the embryo; on the other, the need to balance conflicting interests arising from the application of ART. The study reveals that the international law-making process on ART is at a very early stage, while human rights courts play a prominent role in ruling on these technologies. As its case law demonstrates, the European Court of Human Rights elaborates argumentative ploys to back its conclusions. In doing so, it expresses ethical stances capable of influencing the moral debate on divisive topics.
9
1-2
56
70
http://www.inderscience.com/ijpl
Artificial reproductive technologies; Bioethics; ECtHR; Embryo; European consensus; Gestational surrogacy; Human dignity; Human rights law; Margin of appreciation; PGD; Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; Reproductive freedom; Soft law;
Poli L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LudovicaPoli_ART and HR_18Jan17 PREPRINT.docx

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 64.8 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
64.8 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1686112
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact