It is a truth universally acknowledged that corrective justice is the pillar on which the whole system of remedies rests in principle and modern tort liability revolves around the idea of compensation. Deeply anchored to that conception, Italian case law has been impervious to punitive damages, on the grounds of their alleged inconsistency with public policy, until its latest developments. Starting from the recent judgment by the Italian Grand Chamber on the punitive damages dilemma, this article provides some food for thought about such evolution and the criticalities left unsolved.
The Grand Chamber's Stand on the Punitive Damages Dilemma
Letizia Coppo
2018-01-01
Abstract
It is a truth universally acknowledged that corrective justice is the pillar on which the whole system of remedies rests in principle and modern tort liability revolves around the idea of compensation. Deeply anchored to that conception, Italian case law has been impervious to punitive damages, on the grounds of their alleged inconsistency with public policy, until its latest developments. Starting from the recent judgment by the Italian Grand Chamber on the punitive damages dilemma, this article provides some food for thought about such evolution and the criticalities left unsolved.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Punitive Damages.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
761.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
761.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.