Community psychology is central to understanding how immigrants and more established residents of their new settings join together to develop a shared sense of community and membership. In our present study, we explored how newer (i.e., first‐ and second‐generation immigrants) and more established community members form multiple positive psychological sense of community (PSOC) with one another. We conducted a multinational, qualitative study of PSOC through interviews with 201 first‐ and second‐generation immigrants and third generation or more “receiving community members” in three contexts (Baltimore‐Washington corridor of the U.S.; Torino, Italy; Lecce, Italy). Results indicated numerous similarities among the ways in which participants constructed PSOC in shared and nonshared communities, regardless of immigration/citizenship status, length of community residence, city, country, age, or gender. Small, proximal, and salient communities were often particularly important to building positive PSOC, which was formed around diverse membership boundaries. As intersectional beings, members converged and diverged on many characteristics, providing multiple opportunities for members to bring diversity to their communities while sharing other characteristics deemed essential to membership. Nonetheless, findings point to significant, structural challenges rooted in power and privilege that must be confronted to bridge the community‐diversity dialectic and build strong, shared sense of community.

Shared Communities: A Multinational Qualitative Study of Immigrant and Receiving Community Members

Fedi, Angela;Miglietta, Anna;Gattino, Silvia
2018-01-01

Abstract

Community psychology is central to understanding how immigrants and more established residents of their new settings join together to develop a shared sense of community and membership. In our present study, we explored how newer (i.e., first‐ and second‐generation immigrants) and more established community members form multiple positive psychological sense of community (PSOC) with one another. We conducted a multinational, qualitative study of PSOC through interviews with 201 first‐ and second‐generation immigrants and third generation or more “receiving community members” in three contexts (Baltimore‐Washington corridor of the U.S.; Torino, Italy; Lecce, Italy). Results indicated numerous similarities among the ways in which participants constructed PSOC in shared and nonshared communities, regardless of immigration/citizenship status, length of community residence, city, country, age, or gender. Small, proximal, and salient communities were often particularly important to building positive PSOC, which was formed around diverse membership boundaries. As intersectional beings, members converged and diverged on many characteristics, providing multiple opportunities for members to bring diversity to their communities while sharing other characteristics deemed essential to membership. Nonetheless, findings point to significant, structural challenges rooted in power and privilege that must be confronted to bridge the community‐diversity dialectic and build strong, shared sense of community.
2018
62
1-2
23
40
Immigration; Intergroup relationships; Psychological sense of community; Receiving community; Health (social science); Applied Psychology; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Buckingham, Sara L.; Brodsky, Anne E.; Rochira, Alessia; Fedi, Angela; Mannarini, Terri; Emery, Lindsay; Godsay, Surbhi; Miglietta, Anna; Gattino, Sil...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Joint PSOC Final - Version 2 - 4.5.18.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 207.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
207.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
ajcp.12255.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 142.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
142.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1689795
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact