OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to report the 5-year outcomes of a coverage procedure of shallow maxillary soft tissue dehiscences, around single tissue-level implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The original population consisted of 16 patients presenting a single maxillary buccal implant soft tissue recession. A connective tissue graft, taken from the maxillary tuberosity, was inserted underneath a split-thickness envelope flap. After treatment, patients received individually tailored supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). RESULTS: Two patients were lost to follow-up, while one implant was removed due to peri-implantitis, before the final examination. At 5 years, complete implant soft tissue coverage was depicted in 8 out of 13 cases (62%). Mean soft tissue dehiscence coverage was 86%. Patients' esthetic evaluation showed the persistency of high VAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around single implant, followed by regular supportive therapy, resulted in good esthetic and functional results in the majority of patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Within the limits of this study, the positive results suggest that the proposed technique may be a reliable option in selected cases.

Treatment of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around single implant: 5-year results from a prospective study

Dalmasso, Paola;
2019-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to report the 5-year outcomes of a coverage procedure of shallow maxillary soft tissue dehiscences, around single tissue-level implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The original population consisted of 16 patients presenting a single maxillary buccal implant soft tissue recession. A connective tissue graft, taken from the maxillary tuberosity, was inserted underneath a split-thickness envelope flap. After treatment, patients received individually tailored supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). RESULTS: Two patients were lost to follow-up, while one implant was removed due to peri-implantitis, before the final examination. At 5 years, complete implant soft tissue coverage was depicted in 8 out of 13 cases (62%). Mean soft tissue dehiscence coverage was 86%. Patients' esthetic evaluation showed the persistency of high VAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around single implant, followed by regular supportive therapy, resulted in good esthetic and functional results in the majority of patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Within the limits of this study, the positive results suggest that the proposed technique may be a reliable option in selected cases.
2019
23
4
1977
1983
http://springerlink.metapress.com/app/home/journal.asp?wasp=78519upqrp4yup5ctav0&referrer=parent&backto=browsepublicationsresults,96,541;
Dental implant; Esthetics; Gingival recession; Mucogingival surgery; PROMs; Soft tissue dehiscence; Dentistry (all)
Roccuzzo, Mario; Dalmasso, Paola; Pittoni, Dario; Roccuzzo, Andrea*
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Roccuzzo2019_Article_TreatmentOfBuccalSoftTissueDeh.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 810.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
810.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1690778
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact