Although international migration is per definition a transnational phenomenon, migration and migrant integration policies are mostly associated with national policies. The national models approach has been dominant throughout the 1990s in the study of both immigrant integration and immigration control policies. However, for decades already, several aspects of immigration and immigrant integration policies have increasingly been shifted upwards, to the international level (to the European Union (EU) and international organisations), downwards, to the sub-state level (regional and local authorities) and outwards, to sending states, civil society and private actors. Since the early 2000s scholars have been more engaged in making sense of these processes of the redefinition of state competence and the diffusion of power. They have challenged the ‘national models’ heuristic and its underlying assumption of the existence of internally consistent and homogeneous national approaches to migration. In the general political science literature, the move away from the nation state as the ‘natural container’ of political processes, and therefore as the main focus of scientific investigation, had already started at least one decade before. Confronted with the increasing consolidation of supranational EU institutions as well as with processes of devolution of powers towards lower tiers of government and non-public actors, political scientists coined the concept of multi-level governance. To undertake a literature review of this emerging and burgeoning literature in migration policy studies is a challenging and complicated task, especially because only very few studies on migration policies have explicitly adopted the MLG conceptual tools. We argue, in this chapter, that existing MLG-relevant research on migration policy on the one hand, and immigrant integration policy on the other hand looks like two reversed pyramids. While research on migration policy focuses mostly on the interaction in upper governmental tiers, namely between international organisations (IOs) (among which the EU) and the state, research on the multi-level governance of migrant integration is mostly situated at lower tiers of government, namely between the state and the local authorities and/or regions. Beyond differences between the subfields of the multi-level governance of migration and migrant integration, the chapter also sheds light on different research foci of North American and European research.

Research on the multi-level governance of migration and migrant integration. Reversed pyramids.

Tiziana Caponio
2019-01-01

Abstract

Although international migration is per definition a transnational phenomenon, migration and migrant integration policies are mostly associated with national policies. The national models approach has been dominant throughout the 1990s in the study of both immigrant integration and immigration control policies. However, for decades already, several aspects of immigration and immigrant integration policies have increasingly been shifted upwards, to the international level (to the European Union (EU) and international organisations), downwards, to the sub-state level (regional and local authorities) and outwards, to sending states, civil society and private actors. Since the early 2000s scholars have been more engaged in making sense of these processes of the redefinition of state competence and the diffusion of power. They have challenged the ‘national models’ heuristic and its underlying assumption of the existence of internally consistent and homogeneous national approaches to migration. In the general political science literature, the move away from the nation state as the ‘natural container’ of political processes, and therefore as the main focus of scientific investigation, had already started at least one decade before. Confronted with the increasing consolidation of supranational EU institutions as well as with processes of devolution of powers towards lower tiers of government and non-public actors, political scientists coined the concept of multi-level governance. To undertake a literature review of this emerging and burgeoning literature in migration policy studies is a challenging and complicated task, especially because only very few studies on migration policies have explicitly adopted the MLG conceptual tools. We argue, in this chapter, that existing MLG-relevant research on migration policy on the one hand, and immigrant integration policy on the other hand looks like two reversed pyramids. While research on migration policy focuses mostly on the interaction in upper governmental tiers, namely between international organisations (IOs) (among which the EU) and the state, research on the multi-level governance of migrant integration is mostly situated at lower tiers of government, namely between the state and the local authorities and/or regions. Beyond differences between the subfields of the multi-level governance of migration and migrant integration, the chapter also sheds light on different research foci of North American and European research.
2019
The Routledge Handbook on the Politics of Migration in Europe
Routledge
Routledge International Handbooks
26
37
9781138201187
https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-the-Politics-of-Migration-in-Europe/Weinar-Bonjour-Zhyznomirska/p/book/9781138201187
Multilevel governance, migration policy, integration policy
Ilke Adam and Tiziana Caponio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
651_02_Handbook of Politics of Migration in Europe.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 262.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
262.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1691794
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact