Does gender influence outcome of AAA endoluminal repair?

Background: it has been suggested that female patients have a less favourable outcome of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Yet, data on stratified per gender are lacking. Methods: we reviewed our prospective database of 402 endografts over a 4-year period and the peri- and postoperative course in the 25 (6%) female patients was compared with the 377 (94%) male patients. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 1-56 months). Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the effect of five confounding variables (gender, age, ASA grade IV, EUROSTAR class D or E, AAA diameter) on failure of AAA exclusion. Results: there were no perioperative deaths in the female group and 5 (1.3%) in the male group (p = 0.8). Major perioperative morbidity occurred in 17% versus 6% (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.2-10.6; p = 0.026). There were 1 (4%) and 5 (1%) conversions to open repair in the female and male groups, respectively (p = 0.3). Late failure of AAA exclusion occurred in 5 (21%) and 26 (7%) patients, respectively (p = 0.03). Of the five variables examined for their influence on failure of AAA exclusion, female gender (hazard ratio 4.42; 95% CI 1.4-13.4; p = 0.009) and AAA diameter (hazard ratio 1.05; 95% CI 1.009-1.09; p = 0.017), were positive independent predictors of late failure of AAA exclusion on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: endoluminal AAA repair in female patients appear associated with a less favorable outcome when compared to their male counterparts. These data may be taken into consideration when enodoluminal AAA repair is suggested to a female patient