This article replies to the criticisms of Ratti, and of Brigaglia and Celano, of the model theory of deontics. It argues that the theory is consistent and that logic is an implausible basis for human reasoning.
A reply to Ratti and Brigaglia and Celano's comments on deontics: Meaning, reasoning, and emotion
Monica Bucciarelli
2019-01-01
Abstract
This article replies to the criticisms of Ratti, and of Brigaglia and Celano, of the model theory of deontics. It argues that the theory is consistent and that logic is an implausible basis for human reasoning.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A reply to Ratti and Brigaglia and Celano's comments on deontics.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
66.13 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
66.13 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
