This longitudinal study investigated whether smoking bans influence passive smoking at work and/or at home in the same subjects. Passive smoking at work and/or at home was investigated in random population samples (European Community Respiratory Health Survey) in 1990-95, with follow-up interviews in 1998-2003 and 2010-2014. National smoking bans were classified as partial (restricted to public workplaces) or global (extended to private workplaces). Multivariable analysis was accomplished by three-level logistic regression models, where level-1, level-2 and level-3 units were respectively questionnaire responses, subjects and centres. Passive smoking at work was reported by 31.9% in 1990-95, 17.5% in 1998-2003 and 2.5% in 2010-14. Concurrently passive smoking at home decreased from 28.9% to 18.2% and 8.8%. When controlling for sex, age, education, individual smoking habits and ECHRS wave in multivariable analysis, the odds of passive smoking at work was nearly halved after global smoking bans (OR=0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81), particularly among non-smokers, while the protective effect of global smoking bans on passive smoking at home was only detected in non-smokers. Smoking bans both in public and private workplaces were effective in reducing passive smoking at work in Europe. However, given the inefficacy of smoking bans in current smokers’ dwellings, better strategies are needed to avoid smoking indoors.

Effects of smoking bans on passive smoking exposure at work and at home. The European Community Respiratory Health Survey

Roberto Bono;
2019-01-01

Abstract

This longitudinal study investigated whether smoking bans influence passive smoking at work and/or at home in the same subjects. Passive smoking at work and/or at home was investigated in random population samples (European Community Respiratory Health Survey) in 1990-95, with follow-up interviews in 1998-2003 and 2010-2014. National smoking bans were classified as partial (restricted to public workplaces) or global (extended to private workplaces). Multivariable analysis was accomplished by three-level logistic regression models, where level-1, level-2 and level-3 units were respectively questionnaire responses, subjects and centres. Passive smoking at work was reported by 31.9% in 1990-95, 17.5% in 1998-2003 and 2.5% in 2010-14. Concurrently passive smoking at home decreased from 28.9% to 18.2% and 8.8%. When controlling for sex, age, education, individual smoking habits and ECHRS wave in multivariable analysis, the odds of passive smoking at work was nearly halved after global smoking bans (OR=0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81), particularly among non-smokers, while the protective effect of global smoking bans on passive smoking at home was only detected in non-smokers. Smoking bans both in public and private workplaces were effective in reducing passive smoking at work in Europe. However, given the inefficacy of smoking bans in current smokers’ dwellings, better strategies are needed to avoid smoking indoors.
2019
29
4
670
679
second hand smoke; smoking restriction; workplace; home environment; social settings; follow-up study
Mario Olivieri, Nicola Murgia, Anne-Elie Carsin, Joachim Heinrich, Geza Benke, Roberto Bono, Angelo Guido Corsico, Pascal Demoly, Bertil Forsberg, Tho...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Olivieri_et_al-2019-Indoor_Air.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 558.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
558.64 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Olivieri_et_al-2019-Indoor_Air-1.pdf

Open Access dal 18/05/2020

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 394.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
394.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
INDOOR AIR Olivieri.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 625.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
625.51 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1701700
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact