European Directives 2002/44/EC, and 2003/10/EC establish the exposure limit values for preventing operators’ risks to vibration and noise transmitted by machines. Few studies studied noise and vibration of agricultural backpack powered machines (as mistblowers and blowers), but nobody critically studied them. This work analyzed in field back vibration, hand-arm vibration (HAV), and noise transmitted to ten operators by eight blowers and mistblowers. Unweighted and weighted vibration were analyzed, using the standards ISO 2631-1 (back), and ISO 5349-1 and ISO/TR 18570 (hand-arm system). Noise was evaluated recording the acoustic pressure level at the operators’ ears using the ISO 9612. With the ISO 2631-1, the vibration to the operators’ back was low (0.38 ms-2), but the unweighted vibration measured along y and z axes (not used by the ISO 2631-1) were high (>11 ms-2). HAV were also low when using the ISO 5349-1 (the highest value was 2.51 ms-2 in mistblowers), but high with the ISO/TR 18570 for the onset of vibration white finger (1446 ms-1.5 in blowers). Noise levels were always high: more than 100 dB(A), excluding the blower with the exhaust inside the blower hose. This last machine had noise levels lower than 86 dB(A), but its specific feature could increase the environmental pollution.

Vibration and noise transmitted by agricultural backpack powered machines critically examined using the current standards

Angela Calvo
First
;
Roberto Deboli
2019-01-01

Abstract

European Directives 2002/44/EC, and 2003/10/EC establish the exposure limit values for preventing operators’ risks to vibration and noise transmitted by machines. Few studies studied noise and vibration of agricultural backpack powered machines (as mistblowers and blowers), but nobody critically studied them. This work analyzed in field back vibration, hand-arm vibration (HAV), and noise transmitted to ten operators by eight blowers and mistblowers. Unweighted and weighted vibration were analyzed, using the standards ISO 2631-1 (back), and ISO 5349-1 and ISO/TR 18570 (hand-arm system). Noise was evaluated recording the acoustic pressure level at the operators’ ears using the ISO 9612. With the ISO 2631-1, the vibration to the operators’ back was low (0.38 ms-2), but the unweighted vibration measured along y and z axes (not used by the ISO 2631-1) were high (>11 ms-2). HAV were also low when using the ISO 5349-1 (the highest value was 2.51 ms-2 in mistblowers), but high with the ISO/TR 18570 for the onset of vibration white finger (1446 ms-1.5 in blowers). Noise levels were always high: more than 100 dB(A), excluding the blower with the exhaust inside the blower hose. This last machine had noise levels lower than 86 dB(A), but its specific feature could increase the environmental pollution.
2019
16
2210
1
20
vibration, noise, blower, mistblower
Angela Calvo, Christian Preti, Maria Caria, Roberto Deboli
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
vibration_backpack_ijerp.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 4.72 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.72 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1704683
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact