We evaluated the effects of a compost bedded-pack barn as an alternative housing system for dairy cattle in Italy. Twenty-two Fleckvieh dairy cows were randomly allocated to two housing systems: (1) a conventional freestall barn (FB) and (2) a compost bedded-pack barn (CB). Clinical data and behavioural measurements were collected. Milk quality parameters and cheese characteristics were also evaluated. Scores for hind limb cleanliness and locomotion were better in the CB-housed than in the FB-housed cows (p < .01). The incidence of standing was higher (p < .01), while that of lying in head-up position and the expression of agonistic interaction were lower (p < .001) in the CB-housed animals. An avoidance distance of 50 cm was more frequent, whereas a distance of more than 100 cm was less frequent among the CB-housed animals (p < .001). Milk fat content was greater and somatic cell count was lower, as were total bacterial count (TBC) and coliforms in cheese made from milk from the CB-housed cows (p < .05). Descriptive comparisons between CB and FB bedding materials revealed promising results for salinity, fulvic + humic acid content, ammonia concentration, and TBC, but also issues related to bacterial levels, temperature, and nutrient composition of CB bedding material. Our results suggest that cow health and welfare, as well as milk and milk product quality, may benefit from CB housing, supporting its potential as a promising alternative loose-housing system for dairy cattle in Italy.

Compost bedded-pack barn as an alternativehousing system for dairy cattle in Italy: effectson animal health and welfare and milk and milkproduct quality

Ilaria Biasato
First
;
Antonio D’Angelo;Iride Bertone;Rosangela Odore;Claudio Bellino
2019-01-01

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of a compost bedded-pack barn as an alternative housing system for dairy cattle in Italy. Twenty-two Fleckvieh dairy cows were randomly allocated to two housing systems: (1) a conventional freestall barn (FB) and (2) a compost bedded-pack barn (CB). Clinical data and behavioural measurements were collected. Milk quality parameters and cheese characteristics were also evaluated. Scores for hind limb cleanliness and locomotion were better in the CB-housed than in the FB-housed cows (p < .01). The incidence of standing was higher (p < .01), while that of lying in head-up position and the expression of agonistic interaction were lower (p < .001) in the CB-housed animals. An avoidance distance of 50 cm was more frequent, whereas a distance of more than 100 cm was less frequent among the CB-housed animals (p < .001). Milk fat content was greater and somatic cell count was lower, as were total bacterial count (TBC) and coliforms in cheese made from milk from the CB-housed cows (p < .05). Descriptive comparisons between CB and FB bedding materials revealed promising results for salinity, fulvic + humic acid content, ammonia concentration, and TBC, but also issues related to bacterial levels, temperature, and nutrient composition of CB bedding material. Our results suggest that cow health and welfare, as well as milk and milk product quality, may benefit from CB housing, supporting its potential as a promising alternative loose-housing system for dairy cattle in Italy.
2019
18
1
1142
1153
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1828051X.2019.1623095
Compost barn, dairy cattle, housing system, milk, welfare
Ilaria Biasato, Antonio D’Angelo, Iride Bertone, Rosangela Odore, Claudio Bellino
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Compost bedded pack barn as an alternative housing system for dairy cattle in Italy effects on animal health and welfare and milk and milk product.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.43 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1707426
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact