This article tries to explore the meaning of the famous polemic of the Sixties in which Barthes and Foucault supported the “nonexistence of the author”, showing its ideological and non–scientific character and the link with an anti–humanistic project whose philosophical roots are found in Heidegger and the political ones in Marxism. It is further argued that semiotics, in light of its competence on narrative syntax, has the tools to show the scientific groundlessness and the pretentious character of the controversy.

Ideology and Science in the Debate about the Non–Existence of the Author

Ugo Volli
2019-01-01

Abstract

This article tries to explore the meaning of the famous polemic of the Sixties in which Barthes and Foucault supported the “nonexistence of the author”, showing its ideological and non–scientific character and the link with an anti–humanistic project whose philosophical roots are found in Heidegger and the political ones in Marxism. It is further argued that semiotics, in light of its competence on narrative syntax, has the tools to show the scientific groundlessness and the pretentious character of the controversy.
2019
29-30
24
44
Author, Postmodernism. Ideology, Barthes, Foucault
Ugo Volli
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Articolo Intentionality bozza editoriale finale.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 469.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
469.86 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1708685
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact