Objectives: Due to the inconclusive findings on the effect of laser therapy in the management of peri-implant diseases, the aim of this study was to analyze the adjunctive clinical efficacy of 980-nm diode laser (DL) irradiation in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical debridement. Material and methods: Two hundred and twenty patients with one implant diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis (probing depth (PD) ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing (BoP) (primary outcome)) were randomly allocated to test and control treatments. Patients in the control group (n = 110) received debridement using curettes and ultrasonic devices, while patients allocated in the test group (n = 110) received mechanical therapy in combination with DL irradiation (setting 980 nm, 2.5 W, 10 KHz, pw, 30 s). BoP, presence of plaque and PD were recorded at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Results: Both therapeutic modalities yielded similar clinical improvements with comparable reductions in the number of BoP-positive sites, plaque scores and PD values at 3 months (all P-values > 0.05). Complete disease resolution was obtained in 38/110 (34.5%) implants in the test group compared with 34/110 (30.9 %) implants in the control group at the end of the observation period. Conclusion: Based on these results, the adjunct use of DL did not yield any statistically significant clinical benefit as compared to non-surgical mechanical treatment alone in controlling peri-implant inflammation at 3 months.
Adjunctive efficacy of diode laser in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical therapy: A randomized clinical trial
Aimetti M.
First
;Romano F.
2019-01-01
Abstract
Objectives: Due to the inconclusive findings on the effect of laser therapy in the management of peri-implant diseases, the aim of this study was to analyze the adjunctive clinical efficacy of 980-nm diode laser (DL) irradiation in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical debridement. Material and methods: Two hundred and twenty patients with one implant diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis (probing depth (PD) ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing (BoP) (primary outcome)) were randomly allocated to test and control treatments. Patients in the control group (n = 110) received debridement using curettes and ultrasonic devices, while patients allocated in the test group (n = 110) received mechanical therapy in combination with DL irradiation (setting 980 nm, 2.5 W, 10 KHz, pw, 30 s). BoP, presence of plaque and PD were recorded at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Results: Both therapeutic modalities yielded similar clinical improvements with comparable reductions in the number of BoP-positive sites, plaque scores and PD values at 3 months (all P-values > 0.05). Complete disease resolution was obtained in 38/110 (34.5%) implants in the test group compared with 34/110 (30.9 %) implants in the control group at the end of the observation period. Conclusion: Based on these results, the adjunct use of DL did not yield any statistically significant clinical benefit as compared to non-surgical mechanical treatment alone in controlling peri-implant inflammation at 3 months.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Aimetti_et_al-2019-Clinical_Oral_Implants_Research.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo PDF editoriale
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
934.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
934.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Aimetti et al. COIR_2019.pdf
Open Access dal 17/04/2020
Descrizione: Post print
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
12.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
12.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.