Objectives: Due to the inconclusive findings on the effect of laser therapy in the management of peri-implant diseases, the aim of this study was to analyze the adjunctive clinical efficacy of 980-nm diode laser (DL) irradiation in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical debridement. Material and methods: Two hundred and twenty patients with one implant diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis (probing depth (PD) ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing (BoP) (primary outcome)) were randomly allocated to test and control treatments. Patients in the control group (n = 110) received debridement using curettes and ultrasonic devices, while patients allocated in the test group (n = 110) received mechanical therapy in combination with DL irradiation (setting 980 nm, 2.5 W, 10 KHz, pw, 30 s). BoP, presence of plaque and PD were recorded at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Results: Both therapeutic modalities yielded similar clinical improvements with comparable reductions in the number of BoP-positive sites, plaque scores and PD values at 3 months (all P-values > 0.05). Complete disease resolution was obtained in 38/110 (34.5%) implants in the test group compared with 34/110 (30.9 %) implants in the control group at the end of the observation period. Conclusion: Based on these results, the adjunct use of DL did not yield any statistically significant clinical benefit as compared to non-surgical mechanical treatment alone in controlling peri-implant inflammation at 3 months.

Adjunctive efficacy of diode laser in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical therapy: A randomized clinical trial

Aimetti M.
First
;
Romano F.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: Due to the inconclusive findings on the effect of laser therapy in the management of peri-implant diseases, the aim of this study was to analyze the adjunctive clinical efficacy of 980-nm diode laser (DL) irradiation in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical debridement. Material and methods: Two hundred and twenty patients with one implant diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis (probing depth (PD) ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing (BoP) (primary outcome)) were randomly allocated to test and control treatments. Patients in the control group (n = 110) received debridement using curettes and ultrasonic devices, while patients allocated in the test group (n = 110) received mechanical therapy in combination with DL irradiation (setting 980 nm, 2.5 W, 10 KHz, pw, 30 s). BoP, presence of plaque and PD were recorded at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Results: Both therapeutic modalities yielded similar clinical improvements with comparable reductions in the number of BoP-positive sites, plaque scores and PD values at 3 months (all P-values > 0.05). Complete disease resolution was obtained in 38/110 (34.5%) implants in the test group compared with 34/110 (30.9 %) implants in the control group at the end of the observation period. Conclusion: Based on these results, the adjunct use of DL did not yield any statistically significant clinical benefit as compared to non-surgical mechanical treatment alone in controlling peri-implant inflammation at 3 months.
2019
30
5
429
438
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501
decontamination; dental implant; diode laser; inflammation; mucositis
Aimetti M.; Mariani G.M.; Ferrarotti F.; Ercoli E.; Liu C.C.; Romano F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Aimetti_et_al-2019-Clinical_Oral_Implants_Research.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo PDF editoriale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 934.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
934.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Aimetti et al. COIR_2019.pdf

Open Access dal 17/04/2020

Descrizione: Post print
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 12.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
12.44 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1710809
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact