Wittgenstein’s Tractatus is marked by an internal tension between an analytic principle (centred on the concept of simple object) and a synthetic one (centred on the concept of form). I call this tension “the Cosmological Antinomy” of the Tractatus. I try then to deal with this issue on the basis of Hegel’s discussion of Kant’s second antinomy in the Science of Logic, where the general, anti-analytical presuppositions of Hegel’s philosophy clearly emerge. Hegel’s philosophy, as a philosophy of movement, of becoming and of life, is a philosophy of continuum, which contrasts with every atomistic conception of the world.
Are There Simple Objects? Hegel’s Discussion of Kant’s Second Antinomy in Relation to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
G. Chiurazzi
2019-01-01
Abstract
Wittgenstein’s Tractatus is marked by an internal tension between an analytic principle (centred on the concept of simple object) and a synthetic one (centred on the concept of form). I call this tension “the Cosmological Antinomy” of the Tractatus. I try then to deal with this issue on the basis of Hegel’s discussion of Kant’s second antinomy in the Science of Logic, where the general, anti-analytical presuppositions of Hegel’s philosophy clearly emerge. Hegel’s philosophy, as a philosophy of movement, of becoming and of life, is a philosophy of continuum, which contrasts with every atomistic conception of the world.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Are There Simple Objects (authors copy).pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: articolo
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
204.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
204.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.