Wittgenstein’s Tractatus is marked by an internal tension between an analytic principle (centred on the concept of simple object) and a synthetic one (centred on the concept of form). I call this tension “the Cosmological Antinomy” of the Tractatus. I try then to deal with this issue on the basis of Hegel’s discussion of Kant’s second antinomy in the Science of Logic, where the general, anti-analytical presuppositions of Hegel’s philosophy clearly emerge. Hegel’s philosophy, as a philosophy of movement, of becoming and of life, is a philosophy of continuum, which contrasts with every atomistic conception of the world.

Are There Simple Objects? Hegel’s Discussion of Kant’s Second Antinomy in Relation to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

G. Chiurazzi
2019-01-01

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s Tractatus is marked by an internal tension between an analytic principle (centred on the concept of simple object) and a synthetic one (centred on the concept of form). I call this tension “the Cosmological Antinomy” of the Tractatus. I try then to deal with this issue on the basis of Hegel’s discussion of Kant’s second antinomy in the Science of Logic, where the general, anti-analytical presuppositions of Hegel’s philosophy clearly emerge. Hegel’s philosophy, as a philosophy of movement, of becoming and of life, is a philosophy of continuum, which contrasts with every atomistic conception of the world.
2019
Wittgenstein and Hegel. Reevaluation of Difference
de Gruyter
On Wittgenstein
5
329
342
978-3-11-056885-1
Wittgenstein, Hegel, simple object, second antinomy, continuity, discontinuity
G. Chiurazzi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Are There Simple Objects (authors copy).pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: articolo
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 204.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
204.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1720789
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact